Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2026

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Published on: February 10, 2017
REFRACTORY BENIGN ESOPHAGEAL STRICTURES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY
Aléxia Bezerra de Mendonça Belarmino1, José Jota Moura Neto2, Helena Aben-Athar Ponte2
1Universidade Federal do Ceará, Hospital Universitário Walter Cantídio, Fortaleza, CE, Brasil.
Background:
Refractory benign esophageal strictures (RBES) represent a significant clinical challenge due to their diverse etiologies and the variety of available therapeutic approaches. They affect approximately 30-40% of patients with recurrent strictures.
Objective:
To evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic therapies stratified by stricture etiology (anastomotic vs nonanastomotic).
Methods:
We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, including studies published between 2005 and 2025. Literature searches were performed in PubMed, ScienceDirect, and the CAPES Portal. Outcomes assessed included technical success, complication rates, and long-term clinical success. Study screening and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers using Rayyan software.
Results:
Eighteen studies were included, comprising 208 individuals with anastomotic strictures (72.2% of studies) and 265 with nonanastomotic strictures (77.8% of studies). Therapeutic modalities included bougie dilation (7 studies; 38.9%), balloon dilation (7; 38.9%), triamcinolone injection (2; 11.1%), mitomycin C (3; 16.7%), stricturotomy (6; 33.3%), stent placement (10; 55.6%), and self-dilation (1; 5.6%). The overall technical success rate was 84.1%, whereas clinical success was 58.1%. Anastomotic strictures were associated with a worse prognosis, exhibiting a technical success rate of 89.4%, a complication rate of 33.2%, and a clinical success rate of 53.8%. Nonanastomotic strictures showed a technical success rate of 80.0%, a complication rate of 11.3%, and a clinical success rate of 61.1%. Four definitions of refractoriness were identified; the most common was the failure to achieve a diameter of 14 mm to 15 mm or greater after multiple dilations (9 studies) and repeated dilations without quantified criteria (5 studies).
Conclusion:
RBES demonstrate high technical success rates across therapeutic modalities; however, long-term clinical success remains limited and varies according to etiology. Anastomotic strictures are associated with a worse prognosis than nonanastomotic strictures, likely reflecting the complexity of postsurgical fibrotic remodeling. The marked heterogeneity in definitions of refractoriness across studies represents a critical limitation in the current literature.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations: