Related Experiment Videos
A hybrid RAG and rule-based reasoning framework for technical document analysis
Esther Rachel Thomas1, Niranchna Natarajan1, Keerthana Jayaprakashan1
1School of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.
Abstract:
The ability to access specific operational guidelines in unstructured technical documentation is a crucial and unsolved problem in safety sensitive areas like aerospace, clinical care, and regulatory compliance, where approximate retrieval and hallucination are unacceptable. Current systems of Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) relying on dense vector embeddings are unable to offer the deterministic accuracy such environments require. In this paper, a neurosymbolic framework is provided to overcome this limitation through the translation of natural language documents into three complementary representations of symbolic knowledge: a SQLite (Lightweight SQL Database Engine) database of SAT (Boolean Satisfiability) - based propositional reasoning Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF) clauses, a directed property graph relational traversal and a geometric spatial index which represents the quantitative conditional rules as axis aligned hyper rectangles in an eight dimensional parameter space. Each of the three representations is built on the same LLM (Large Language Model) - based rule extraction pipeline at the same time during offline stage, where there is no embedding of vectors of any type. Online three path reasoning architecture combines SAT at query time entailment checking, knowledge graph traversal, and exact geometric containment testing - translating the operational state of a user to a parameter space point and recalling all rules with hyper rectangular regions containing the point. The outputs of all the three paths are combined before constrained answer generation, basing each answer on logical, relational, and numerical evidence. Because retrieval is performed using mathematically precise symbolic procedures rather than similarity approximation, the SAT, graph, and geometric reasoning components are deterministic and fully explainable; large language model calls are still used for rule extraction and answer synthesis, so the system as a whole is hybrid rather than fully deterministic, and a faithfulness filter together with context-confined generation substantially mitigate, rather than formally guarantee, hallucination. The experimental findings show that this tri-representation strategy markedly enhances retrieval accuracy and reliability compared to embedding-based baselines in complicated operational query conditions, developing a scalable base of rule-based decision support in high stakes areas.
Related Concept Videos
Reasoning
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
Criteria for Aromaticity and the Hückel 4n + 2 Rule
For the first time, Eric Hückel, a German chemical physicist, derived a set of structural features for a compound to be classified as aromatic. This is now known as Hückel’s rule or the 4n + 2 rule.
Rules for Defining Functions
Inductive Reasoning
Reason and Intuition