Endoscopic Evaluation and Management of Diversion Pouchitis and Strictures: In Comparison With Strictures in Nondiverted Pouches
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2026

Vessel-sparing Excision and Primary Anastomosis
Published on: January 7, 2019
Yuanyuan Ge1, Ellen L Scherl2, Dana J Lukin2
1Center of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Columbia University Irving Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York.
Background And Aims:
Postoperative complications after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis are common and may lead to pouch failure requiring long-standing fecal diversion. Patients with diverted pouches can develop diversion pouchitis and strictures; however, the endoscopic features and management of these conditions remain poorly characterized.
Methods:
This historical case-controlled study included 54 consecutive inflammatory bowel disease patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis who underwent endoscopic evaluation and stricturotomy for distal pouch or anastomotic strictures from January 2020 to February 2026. Twelve consecutive patients with diverted pouch strictures were compared with 42 nondiverted controls. Outcomes included pouchitis frequency, stricture characteristics, technical success, endoscopic reintervention, surgery-free survival, and adverse events. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used for survival end points.
Results:
Among diverted patients, 75% (N = 9) had concurrent diversion pouchitis. Strictures in diverted pouches were uniformly severe (100% vs 7.1%, P < .001) and longer (median 1.5 vs 1.0 cm, P = .002), with higher Pouchitis Disease Activity Index endoscopic subscores (median 2.0 vs 1.0, P < .001). Overall technical success was 98.4% (121/123 procedures), comparable between groups (95.2% vs 100%, P = .115). Surgical intervention was required in 3 (25%) diverted vs 9 (21%) nondiverted patients (P > .99); endoscopic reintervention occurred in 6 (50%) vs 18(43%) cases, respectively (P = .7). Surgery-free survival at 12 and 24 months was 88.9% and 47.4% in diverted vs 86.2% and 86.2% in nondiverted patients (log-rank P = .433; hazard ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval 0.45-6.32). Adverse events occurred in 1 diverted (8.33%; abscess) vs 1 nondiverted patient (2.38%; ileus), with no perforation, bleeding, or mortality.
Conclusion:
Most diverted pouch patients had concurrent diversion pouchitis with more severe and longer strictures. Despite these differences, endoscopic stricturotomy was feasible and safe with comparable outcomes to nondiverted pouch strictures.
Related Concept Videos
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Diverticular Disease of the Colon
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...