Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Egalitarian decision-making without equality: Lessons from need-based leadership and consensus in animal societies
Cédric Sueur1, Elodie F Briefer2, Jean-Louis Deneubourg3
1Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, IPHC UMR7178, Université de Strasbourg - CNRS, Strasbourg, Francecedric.sueur@iphc.cnrs.fr.
Abstract:
Drawing on formal models and empirical studies of collective decision-making in animal groups, we show that egalitarian systems can emerge and remain stable despite persistent individual inequalities in needs, information, and social position. Egalitarianism is best understood as a dynamic regulation of influence under heterogeneous conditions, where leadership is conditional, distributed, and reversible rather than fixed or coercive.
Related Concept Videos
Inclusive Fitness
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Equity Theory
Impact of Individuals on a Group
Robbers Cave
Altruism

