Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 4, 2026

Setup and Execution Of the Blindfolded Code Training Exercise
Published on: March 29, 2019
Examining potentially preventable mortality in trauma: What can we do better?
Alexandra M P Brito1, Stephen R Wisniewski, Alan Jackson
1Department of Surgery (A.M.P.B.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR; Department of Surgery (A.M.P.B.), The Queen's Medical Center, Honolulu, HI; School of Public Health (S.R.W., A.J.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Emergency Medicine (F.X.G.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (C.M.B.), Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR; Department of Surgery (H.S., J.L.S.), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences (M.A.S.), Bethesda, MD.
Background:
Trauma systems have undergone substantial evolution over the past several decades. However, we have yet to achieve the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine goal of zero preventable deaths from injury. In this study, we examined preventable deaths within advanced trauma systems to identify opportunities for further improvement.
Methods:
Task Order One, coordinated within the Linking Investigators in Trauma and Emergency Medical Services Network (LiTES) that included over 30 emergency medical service (EMS) agencies transporting to eight level 1 trauma centers in the United States, created an extensive database of severely injured trauma patients. A potentially preventable mortality (PPM) program was developed. Cause of death was reported by study site primary investigators (PIs), cases were selected for review by a prespecified list of prehospital patient/injury characteristics and cause of death. Reports were generated by the data coordination center and reviewed by the LiTES Executive Operating Committee and the site PI.
Results:
Of 2,618 deaths, 391 were reviewed based on established criteria. Of these, 99 (25.3%) were determined to be PPM. For reviewed cases, presenting physiology was similar between PPM and non-PPM patients. Higher proportions of PPM compared with non-PPM were seen in patients who were male, black or African American, with a mechanism of firearm injury or other penetrating injury. The most common cause of PPM was uncontrolled hemorrhage (53%) followed by multiple organ failure (19%), ARDS/primary respiratory failure (9.1%), and coagulopathy (6.1%). Deaths due to uncontrolled hemorrhage and coagulopathy occurred earliest during care.
Conclusions:
In this study, we found that approximately one of our reviewed deaths from injury was potentially preventable. Patients who were male, Black or African American, or sustained firearm or other penetrating injuries were at the highest risk for PPM. On the basis of these data, improvements in hemorrhage management, particularly for firearm and other penetrating injuries, are needed.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III, sub-analysis of prospective observational study.
Related Concept Videos
Flail Chest-II
Assessment:
1. Clinical Evaluation:
History:
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Preventive Healthcare Services
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care