Related Experiment Videos
Community pharmacy transformation under universal health coverage: Implementation barriers, cultural determinants,
Ryuta Urakawa1,2, Kazumi Kubota3,4,5, Risa Marikawa Urakawa6
1Department of Pharmacy, The University of Osaka Dental Hospital, 1-8 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Background:
Community pharmacies worldwide are shifting from product-centered dispensing toward patient-centered clinical services. Japan achieved a prescribing-dispensing separation rate exceeding 80%, yet faces persistent challenges in delivering patient-centered services. This review examines why Japan's transformation has progressed slowly despite favorable structural conditions, and what lessons it offers other universal health coverage (UHC) systems.
Methods:
We conducted a narrative review using PubMed/MEDLINE and Ichushi-Web, covering literature primarily from 2016 to 2026. Six targeted searches addressed Japan's context, three tiers of comparator countries, and implementation science frameworks. From 2388 unique records, 87 publications were included. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0) served as the analytical framework.
Results:
Tier 1 countries demonstrated that successful transformation requires aligned policy incentives, expanded scopes of practice, and robust outcome evidence. Tier 2 countries revealed shared cultural barriers, including physician-dominant hierarchies and dispensing-centered patient expectations. Japan's barriers spanned all five CFIR 2.0 domains: misaligned reimbursement, workforce shortages and absent pharmacy technicians, low pharmacist assertiveness, high service complexity, and fragmented implementation. Cultural factors-particularly high uncertainty avoidance and collectivism-interacted with institutional structures. Japan's family pharmacist system was associated with emerging evidence of benefit, including approximately 9% lower mortality risk, but limited adoption.
Conclusions:
Structural separation alone is insufficient without concurrent investment in workforce capability, practice authority, payment reform, and cultural adaptation. CFIR 2.0 effectively captures the multi-level nature of implementation barriers, supporting performance-based remuneration, scope expansion, and culturally sensitive strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Secondary Healthcare System
Traditional Level Of Health Care System
The preventive healthcare service includes tests for screening. Preventive health care services include identifying and reducing disease risk...