Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2026

A Large Lateral Craniotomy Procedure for Mesoscale Wide-field Optical Imaging of Brain Activity
Published on: May 7, 2017
Stimulating current direction produces depth-dependent spatial selectivity in cortical activation
Daria Shumkova1, Xiaofan Jiang1, Nicholas S C Price2
1Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, Vic, Australia; Department of Physiology, Neuroscience Program, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, Vic, Australia; Monash Vision Group, Monash University, Clayton, 3800, Vic, Australia.
Objective:
Intracortical electrical stimulation is used to modulate brain activity. However, non-selective neuronal activation limits its efficacy. A biphasic electrical stimulation pulse has cathodic (negative) and anodic (positive) phases; swapping them changes current direction. In computational models, different current directions selectively recruit distinct neuronal populations. Whether this occurs in intracortical stimulation is unknown. We tested in vivo whether current direction affects the recruitment of neuronal populations in the cortex.
Approach:
We implanted 20 anaesthetized rats with multichannel silicon probes in the visual cortex to simultaneously stimulate and record across all cortical layers. Stimulation used either cathodic-first or anodic-first biphasic pulses. Models also predict that current direction effects strengthen when the second phase is lengthened relative to the first; therefore, in 7 animals, we tested scaled pulses.
Results:
Cathodic-first pulses evoked stronger responses than anodic-first pulses in input and deep layers. Extending the pulse's second phase transformed cathodic-first magnitude advantage into selective recruitment by collapsing anodic-first neuronal response. This anodic-first deficit was layer- and axis-dependent. Namely, anodic-first activation spread was weakened specifically in input and deep layers in the horizontal dimension, but not superficially.
Conclusion:
Although cathodic-first pulses are generally more effective, this advantage is not uniform across cortical depth, indicating current direction-dependent spatial selectivity. Computational models suggest preferential activation of passing fibers by cathodic-first pulses. Given the abundance of horizontal passing fibers in input and deep layers, we hypothesise that this may explain the layer- and axis-dependent activation we observed. Overall, current direction may be useful as a stimulation parameter in cortical prostheses for achieving depth-dependent spatial selectivity.
More Related Videos
07:20Stimulation Location Determination using a 3D Digitizer with High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Published on: December 20, 2019
09:33Neuronavigated Focalized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Administered During Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: November 15, 2024