Related Experiment Videos
Exacerbation trajectories in biologic-eligible severe asthma patients
Freda Yang1, Dominic C Marshall2, Imran Howell3
1National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK; Guy's and Brompton Asthma Network, Royal Brompton Hospital, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Background:
Asthma biologics are highly effective in reducing exacerbations. Improvement in exacerbations after biologic initiation is often attributed to treatment effect.
Research Question:
What proportion of biologic-eligible severe asthma patients improve without biologic therapy, and what characterises those who remain frequent exacerbators?
Study Design And Methods:
Biologic-naïve adults with severe asthma were identified in nationwide UK electronic medical records. Year 0 was defined as the first year patients met severe asthma criteria with ≥3 systemic corticosteroid-treated exacerbations (biologic-eligible). Post-eligibility exacerbation trajectories were identified using longitudinal k-means. Sensitivity analyses included alternative k and a lower exacerbation threshold (≥2/year). Covariates included the highest blood eosinophil count, inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dose and comorbidities.
Results:
Among 10,078 biologic-eligible adults (median age 51 years; 71% female), we identified three exacerbation trajectories: (1) Remitting-stable (70%, n=7,091), with sustained improvement to <3 exacerbations/year even though ICS reduced after peak exacerbation year; (2) Chronic-frequent (20%, n=1,969), with persistently frequent exacerbations (median 5/year); (3) Refractory-frequent (10%, n=1,018), with high ongoing oral corticosteroid exposure (median >10 courses/year). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Remitting-stable patients were least likely to have bronchiectasis but were otherwise similar in demographics and allergic comorbidities. Blood eosinophil count was higher in the chronic-frequent group (Year 0 median 0.30×109/L) compared with remitting-stable (0.23×109/L) and refractory-frequent groups (0.21×109/L, p<0.001); this was evident several years before meeting biologic exacerbation criteria.
Interpretation:
Over two-thirds of biologic-eligible patients improved with standard care alone. Chronic-frequent exacerbators had higher blood eosinophil counts, even years before meeting biologic criteria, suggesting a distinct disease phenotype.
Related Concept Videos
Asthma-III: Symptoms and Complications
Classification of Asthma
Asthma-IV: Diagnostic and Management
Clinical Assessment for Asthma:
This is the first step in diagnosing and managing asthma. It includes:
Asthma: Pathogenesis and Management
Asthma is classified as allergic and non-allergic. Allergens such as dust mites, pollen, and pet dander trigger allergic asthma, while factors like cold air, intense emotions, or exercise can induce non-allergic asthma.
Asthma III: Clinical Manifestations
Asthma-II: Pathophysiology and Classification
Additionally, environmental and genetic factors play crucial roles in determining an individual's susceptibility to asthma and the severity of their condition.
Critical processes in asthma pathophysiology include:
Asthma I: Introduction