Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2026

The bm12 Inducible Model of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) in C57BL/6 Mice
Published on: November 1, 2015
Performance of lupus classification criteria in monogenic lupus: a national multicentre cohort study
Nergis Akay1, Sezgin Sahin1, Sila Atamyildiz Ucar2
1Department of Paediatric Rheumatology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Objectives:
With advances in genetic testing, monogenic lupus is increasingly recognized, yet disease-specific classification criteria are lacking. We compared all three classification criteria sets in the same monogenic lupus cohort and, for the first time, evaluated their performance across distinct genetic pathways.
Methods:
This national multicentre study included 88 genetically confirmed monogenic lupus patients from 22 paediatric rheumatology centres across Türkiye. Fulfilment of the AmericanCollege of Rheumatology (ACR)-1997, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)-2012 and European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR-2019 criteria and pathway-based differences in classification performance were assessed.
Results:
Overall, 74% (n = 65) fulfilled ACR-1997, 70.5% (n = 62) SLICC-2012 and EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria, and 62.5% (n = 55) met all three, whereas 17% (n = 15) met none. Agreement was substantial (κ = 0.63-0.73), with no significant differences between criteria (P > 0.05). Classification performance differed significantly across genetic pathways (P < 0.05), with the highest fulfilment performances in complement deficiencies and the lowest in nucleic acid metabolism and type I interferon pathway defects. Most patients who did not fulfil any classification criteria had nucleic acid metabolism and clearance defects (13/15, 86.7%). Domain-level analyses showed that classification success was mainly driven by mucocutaneous, immunologic and renal domains. Complement and immune-regulation defects showed a more classical lupus phenotype, with most fulfilling all three criteria (78.6%, 22/28 and 77.8%, 14/18), whereas the proportion was lower in type I interferon pathway and nucleic acid metabolism and clearance defects (33.3%, 2/6 and 47.2%, 17/36). No classification criteria were superior within genetic pathways.
Conclusion:
One-third of genetically confirmed monogenic lupus patients remained unclassified, particularly those with interferon-related and nucleic acid metabolism defects, highlighting pathway-dependent limitations of current classification criteria.
More Related Videos
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay (DAPA)
Published on: August 21, 2016
09:43Analyses of Proteinuria, Renal Infiltration of Leukocytes, and Renal Deposition of Proteins in Lupus-prone MRL/lpr Mice
Published on: June 8, 2022