Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2026
Measuring Maxillary Posterior Tooth Movement: A Model Assessment using Palatal and Dental Superimposition
Published on: February 23, 2024
Are Posterior Teeth Overerupted or Is the Mandibular Ramus Shorter? - A CBCT Study of Skeletal Class II
Xiaoyu Qin1,2, Zhenyuan Zhang2, Ruoxin Du2
1Department of Stomatology, Changzhi People's Hospital, Changzhi, Shanxi Prov, China.
Objective:
The aim of this study is to investigate posterior tooth height and mandibular ramus height in skeletal Class II hyperdivergent patients using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to assess their associations with the hyperdivergent pattern.
Methods:
CBCT data from 60 adult skeletal Class II hyperdivergent patients and 60 adult Class I average-angle patients were analysed. Vertical measurements of posterior teeth and mandibular ramus heights were performed and compared between the two groups using independent samples t-tests. Pearson correlation analyses were performed separately within each group to assess the relationships between posterior teeth heights and mandibular ramus height.
Results:
Both ramus and condyle heights in the Class II hyperdivergent group were significantly shorter than those in the Class I average-angle group (p < 0.001). And the vertical heights of maxillary molars (U6-FH: 48.5 ± 2.9 mm; U7-FH: 44.8 ± 3.2 mm) in the Class II hyperdivergent group were significantly shorter than those in the Class I group (U6-FH: 49.8 ± 2.9 mm; U7-FH: 47.2 ± 3.0 mm; p = 0.013 and p < 0.001, respectively). Posterior tooth height showed positive correlations with mandibular ramus height in both groups. Correlations with condylar height were less consistent, particularly for the lower posterior teeth. Stronger correlations were observed for the upper posterior teeth.
Conclusions:
No evidence of posterior tooth overeruption was observed in skeletal Class II hyperdivergent patients. Instead, a shorter mandibular ramus height was observed in the hyperdivergent group compared with the Class I group. Significant positive correlations were found between posterior tooth height and ramus height. These findings indicate an association between skeletal and dental measurements and do not support the previously hypothesized "struggle" dynamic.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Tooth Anatomy
The Crown, Neck, and Root
The visible part of the tooth is referred to as the crown. It's covered by enamel, the hardest substance in the human body. The crown is uniquely shaped for each type of tooth, allowing for different functions such as cutting, tearing, or grinding food.
01:14Cranial Bones: Superior and Posterior View
The frontal bone is the single bone that forms the forehead. At its anterior midline, between the eyebrows, there is a slight depression called the glabella. The frontal bone also forms the supraorbital margin of the orbit. Near the middle of this margin is the supraorbital foramen, the opening that provides passage for a sensory nerve to the forehead. The frontal bone is thickened just above each supraorbital margin,...
01:15Teeth
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin and...
01:27Cranial Bones: Lateral View
The temporal bone forms the lower lateral side of the skull. The temporal bone is subdivided into several regions. The flattened upper portion is the squamous portion of the temporal bone. Below this area and projecting anteriorly is the zygomatic process of the temporal bone, which forms the posterior portion of the zygomatic arch. Posteriorly is the mastoid portion of the temporal bone. Projecting...