Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2026

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
Published on: February 15, 2015
Access to Arbitrary Stimuli During Fixed-Lean Schedule Thinning
Isaac J Melanson1, Tara A Fahmie2, Cynthia P Livingston2
1Department of Applied Behavioral Science, Dole Human Development Center, University of Kansas, 1000 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66044 USA.
Abstract:
Fixed-lean schedule thinning involves programming the terminal reinforcement schedule from the onset of schedule thinning rather than gradually reducing the delay to reinforcement over time in a dense-to-lean approach. This study extended Sumter et al. (2020) and investigated the effect of continuous access to attention (an arbitrary stimulus; not functionally related to challenging behavior) during fixed-lean schedule thinning for individuals who engaged in challenging behavior maintained by tangible reinforcement or a combination of tangible reinforcement and escape. In some sessions, participants received continuous access to attention during reinforcement schedule thinning, and in others they waited without attention. Results demonstrated a similar reduction in challenging behavior across both conditions. However, two participants, along with the third participant's caregiver, preferred the condition that included attention. This study expands upon existing research by examining the application of arbitrary stimuli within fixed-lean schedule thinning, suggesting that continuous access to attention may enhance treatment acceptability without disruptions to treatment efficacy. • Fixed-lean schedule thinning programs the terminal reinforcement schedule from the start and may be more efficient than other schedule thinning approaches. • Researchers have explored alternatives to traditional extinction during reinforcement schedule thinning, such as the addition of an arbitrary stimulus. • Access to an arbitrary stimulus can help sustain low levels of challenging behavior during reinforcement schedule thinning. • Access to an arbitrary stimulus may be preferred over no access.
Supplementary Information:
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-026-01161-5.

