Translating evidence into policy: a qualitative exploration of stakeholder insights from India's tuberculosis program
Arohi Chauhan1, Sandeep Chauhan2, Swati Iyer3
1Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Background:
The integration of scientific evidence into health policy is vital for building responsive and equitable health systems. However, translating evidence into policy is particularly challenging in low- and middle-income countries, where contextual, institutional, and operational complexities abound. India's National Tuberculosis Elimination Program, a centrally governed initiative, offers a rich context to examine evidence generation and its use in policymaking.
Methods:
an exploratory qualitative study was conducted through 18 interviews with key informants from academia, program management, research, development agencies, and media. Interviews were guided by Jacobson et al.'s Knowledge Translation Framework, and were analyzed thematically using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach with MAXQDA software. Triangulation, member-checking, and reflexivity were employed to ensure analytical rigor and validity.
Results:
The findings reveal that evidence uptake is influenced by leadership priorities, institutional structures, and alignment with policy windows. While formal platforms such as the National Technical Expert Group and Health Technology Assessment India facilitate evidence appraisal for clinical decisions, non-clinical areas such as communication and strategy lack systematic review processes. A disconnect persists between researchers and implementers, with limited co-creation of research questions. Operationally relevant evidence is often missing or inadequately disseminated, and global models are frequently adopted without sufficient local adaptation, reflecting isomorphic mimicry. The credibility of evidence producers and strategic brokering by intermediaries plays a significant role in determining policy influence. Participants emphasized the need for locally grounded, policy-aligned, and practically useful evidence.
Conclusion:
Improving evidence used in the National Tuberculosis Elimination Program requires co-creation, strategic dissemination, and alignment with institutional priorities, leadership timing, and contextual realities.
Spanish Abstract:
https://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A701.
Related Concept Videos
01:28Pulmonary Tuberculosis V
Latent tuberculosis infection occurs when TB bacteria are present in a person's body, but are not causing illness or symptoms. It is not contagious, and preventive treatment is crucial to avoid the progression...
01:26Pulmonary Tuberculosis IV
Several diagnostic approaches are used to detect TB. The conventional method is the Tuberculin Skin Test (TST), also known as the Mantoux test. However, this method has...
01:23Tuberculosis
01:26Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
01:29Pulmonary Tuberculosis I
Causative Organism
The primary infectious agent causing tuberculosis is Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a slow-growing, acid-fast, aerobic rod that exhibits sensitivity to heat and ultraviolet light. Instances of Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium contributing to the development of TB infection are rare.
Mode of...
01:23Investigation of Disease Outbreaks