Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2026

Measurement of the Directional Information Flow in fNIRS-Hyperscanning Data using the Partial Wavelet Transform Coherence Method
Published on: September 3, 2021
A Hierarchical-Dynamic integration model for the formation of interpersonal neural synchrony during spoken
1Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China.
Abstract:
Interpersonal neural synchrony (INS) is widely observed during spoken communication, yet the cognitive and neural processes through which it emerges remain incompletely understood. This review synthesizes evidence on the functional significance, representational organization, and neural implementation of INS and proposes a Hierarchical-Dynamic Integration Model (HDIM) of its formation. HDIM conceptualizes INS as the cross-brain manifestation of ongoing coordination between two interdependent processes: multilevel linguistic alignment and contextual-intentional integration. The hierarchical organization of linguistic alignment encompasses functionally differentiated yet interacting phonological/prosodic, lexical-syntactic, semantic, and higher-order representational levels, without assuming a fixed bottom-up sequence. Its dynamicity arises from recurrent processes of prediction, imitation, and adaptation that continuously regulate interpersonal coordination as communication unfolds. At the neural level, HDIM proposes that linguistic alignment engages distributed bilateral language systems, whereas contextual-intentional integration recruits coordinated activity across language-related and social-cognitive/mentalizing systems. The model yields four empirically testable predictions concerning partial dissociation among representational levels, functional dependencies across levels, temporally differentiated yet interacting regulatory processes, and partner-sensitive integration of linguistic and non-linguistic information. We further identify uneven empirical support across components of the model, together with causal and methodological challenges and limitations in its current scope. We conclude by outlining priorities for causal and interaction-specific testing, computational formalization, and evaluation of the model's boundary conditions and generalizability across communicative contexts.
Related Concept Videos
Neuronal Communication
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
Integration of Synaptic Events
Neurons as Communicators of the Brain
Cell Body
The cell body, also known...
Levels of Communication I: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Small Group
We can participate in these relationships through verbal, nonverbal, and mediated communication. We engage in verbal communication when we use words during our interaction to convey specific meanings. On the other hand, nonverbal communication refers to various factors that can impact how we understand each other—for example, facial expressions.
We interact with others using mediated technologies like the...
Higher Mental Functions of the Brain: Language
Language formation and comprehension take place in the dominant hemisphere. The dominant hemisphere is responsible for understanding the meaning of spoken, written, or sign language, as well as the ability to communicate. For most people, the left hemisphere is the dominant one. The right hemisphere, then, gives tone and emotional context to the...

