Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 13, 2026

ADSC-sheet Transplantation to Prevent Stricture after Extended Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Published on: February 10, 2017
Dupilumab Improves Esophageal Distensibility in EoE: 24-Week Results From the REMODEL Randomized Trial
Evan S Dellon1, Dustin A Carlson2, Thomas Greuter3
1Professor of Medicine, Director, Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Objectives:
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, often progressive, type 2 inflammatory disease characterized by eosinophilic infiltration, and esophageal narrowing and dysfunction. This analysis presents 24-week outcomes from the phase 4 REMODEL trial, evaluating long-term esophageal distensibility in adults with EoE.
Methods:
Adult EoE patients were randomized 2:1 to dupilumab 300 mg once weekly or placebo. Patients were assessed overall and by low (<17 mm) and normal (≥17 mm) baseline distensibility plateau (DP) subgroups. Endpoints at week (W) 24 included: absolute change from baseline in esophageal DP diameter on endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (primary), and changes from baseline in Endoscopic Reference Scores (EREFS) and EoE histology scoring system (EoEHSS) grade/stage scores. Safety was assessed.
Results:
Sixty-nine patients (46 dupilumab, 23 placebo) were randomized. Evaluable patients in the DP subgroups were: 30 low (19 dupilumab, 11 placebo) and 33 normal (22 dupilumab, 11 placebo) baseline DP. At W24 overall, dupilumab improved esophageal DP diameter vs placebo; least squares mean (LSM) (±SE) absolute change from baseline: +1.28 mm (0.29) and -0.01 mm (0.42); LSM difference: +1.30 mm (95% CI: 0.31, 2.29; P < 0.05). LSM difference vs placebo in the low DP subgroup was +2.21 mm (95% CI: 0.78, 3.63; nominal P = 0.0024). Overall LSM difference for dupilumab vs placebo was -4.96 (-6.06, -3.85) in EREFS, and -0.71 (-0.86, -0.57) and -0.65 (-0.80, -0.51) in EoEHSS grade and stage scores, respectively (all P < 0.0001). No new safety signals were identified.
Conclusion:
Dupilumab significantly improved W24 esophageal distensibility outcomes, with greater improvements in the low baseline DP subgroup compared to the overall population. (ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT06101095).
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Achalasia
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...