Related Experiment Videos
Plasma proteomic signatures in bipolar disorder and their implications for data-driven patient stratification
Bruno Pedraz-Petrozzi1, Wahid Boukouaci2, Ophélia Godin2
1Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany; German Center for Mental Health (DZPG), partner site, Mannheim, Germany; Université Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), Institut Henri Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, Laboratoire Neuro-Psychiatrie Translationnelle (IMRB, INSERM U955), Créteil, France; Fondation FondaMental, Créteil, France; French Program on Precision Psychiatry (PEPR PROPSY, France 2030), France.
Abstract:
Bipolar disorder (BD) is a heterogeneous mood disorder that lacks robust biomarkers for biological stratification. We used high-throughput plasma proteomics to characterize case-control differences, identify proteomic subgroups within BD, and examine their associations with blood-based markers and clinical features. Plasma samples from the French I-GIVE (Immuno-Genetics, Inflammation, retroVirus, Environment) cohort, including 248 participants with BD and 76 healthy controls, were assessed using the Olink Reveal panel (1,034 proteins). Age-, sex-, and BMI-adjusted case-control analyses identified 527 differentially expressed proteins in the imputed analysis and 136 in the complete-case analysis, with high agreement in effect estimates and involvement of immune, metabolic, oxidative stress, and endothelial-related processes. Despite the large number of differentially expressed proteins, pathway enrichment was limited to B-cell receptor and chronic myeloid leukemia-related signaling in BD. Unsupervised clustering within BD identified two proteomic subgroups, with enrichment between clusters in longevity-regulating pathways, cellular senescence, FLT3 signaling, and transcription-related pathways. Among four measured inflammatory/endothelial markers, serum amyloid A was the only marker showing a significant difference between groups (FDR < 0.05). Clinical characteristics were similar across clusters, although childhood physical abuse and a greater somatic comorbidity burden were associated with the subgroup showing higher protein abundance. Our findings support biological heterogeneity within BD and suggest that proteomic subgrouping may capture variation not evident in pooled case-control analyses.