Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 14, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Decision tree for improving the impact of equity-focused public health service delivery and research
Cassandra Lane1,2,3,4, Daniel Groombridge2,4, Judith Byaruhanga1,2,4
1School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Introduction:
An equity focus in public health service delivery and research is needed to address persistent health inequities. This requires not only redistribution of health resources and services to prioritised populations, but also attention to the process through which initiatives are selected, designed and implemented, and how these engage with and address the social determinants of health. Applying this in practice can be challenging, and there is limited practical guidance for public health organisations.
Methods:
We adapted a decision tree to support equity-focused public health service delivery and research, aimed at practitioners and researchers working to support the co-design and implementation of effective and socio-culturally responsive health initiatives for a known priority population within a defined public health focus area (e.g., tobacco cessation, physical activity, cancer screening). This tool was informed by the literature and iterative development with an interdisciplinary team of public health professionals, implementation scientists, and health equity academics.
Results:
The Equity-Focused Decision Tree consists of structured decision points and actions across three steps, underpinned by co-creation principles and ongoing local community engagement. Step 1 - Identify or co-design and evaluate an initiative: users integrate empirical and qualitative evidence to a) determine whether any existing initiative is both effective and suitable for the priority population; and b) where none exist, a new initiative is co-designed and evaluated. Step 2 - Assess evidence-practice gaps: users determine whether the initiative is being routinely implemented. Step 3 - Identify implementation strategies: users identify or co-design evidence- and community-informed implementation strategies that are responsive to the community's needs, values, and context.
Conclusion:
This decision tree provides a practical tool to guide public health organisations in applying an equity focus across the process of service delivery and research. It has the potential to advance equity by improving health outcomes for the priority population, and by contributing towards addressing the social determinants of health that underpin persistent health inequities.
Related Concept Videos
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Equity Theory
Preventive Healthcare Services
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...