Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Cangrelor Dosing, Administration, and Clinical Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Complex and High-Risk Percutaneous
Siyu Ma1, Wendy Y Cheng2, Yinong Liang2
1Chiesi USA, Inc, Cary, North Carolina, USA.
Background:
Cangrelor reduces thrombotic events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with the advantage of rapid onset and offset. However, premature discontinuation may increase the risk of acute thrombosis for patients undergoing complex/high-risk PCI (CHIP).
Aims:
We evaluated the real-world administration of cangrelor and related health outcomes for CHIP patients.
Methods:
A US retrospective physician panel medical chart review (1/1/2020 to 6/26/2025) included patients 18+ years old who received cangrelor (1st dose = index date) during CHIP. We summarized patients' characteristics in the 6 months pre-index (baseline), cangrelor dosing and administration (IV bolus and/or infusion), and clinical outcomes within 48 h. We described MACE occurrence by dosing adherence.
Results:
Patients (n = 200) were mostly male (85.5%), had a mean age of 63 years, and had a BMI of 30.2 kg/m2. Most (87.5%) received a cangrelor bolus (30.0 µg/kg) and maintenance infusion (4.0 µg/kg/mins), aligned with intended use recommendations. Of patients analyzed for infusion duration (n = 134), 64.9% deviated from the recommendation of at least 2 h or PCI length. Forty (29.9%) received cangrelor for less than the recommended duration. Overall, 30 (15%) patients experienced MACE, with a higher proportion of MACE seen in those who deviated from the recommended duration (16.1% [95% CI: 3.5%-23.1%] vs. 10.6% [95% CI: 9.1%-25.5%]).
Conclusions:
Our study provides real-world insight into cangrelor use and clinical outcomes in CHIP patients, highlighting notable variability in infusion duration and differences in MACE occurrence by dosing adherence. Further comparative effectiveness studies are warranted to examine the potential impact of deviation from intended dose/duration on clinical outcomes in CHIP.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Angina IV: Management
Angina V: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome V: Nursing Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care