Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2026

Murine Hind Limb Long Bone Dissection and Bone Marrow Isolation
Published on: April 14, 2016
"Single-Centre Audit of Bone-Modifying Agents in Neuroendocrine Neoplasm Bone Metastases"
Wessam Osman1,2, Preetha Aravind3, Hemanth Prabhudev1
1Department of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust , London, UK.
Abstract:
Bone metastases in neuroendocrine neoplasms are uncommon but cause significant morbidity. A recent Italian survey of 320 patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms and bone metastases reported skeletal-related events in 23% and bone-targeted agent use in 31%, highlighting limited evidence for bone-modifying agents. We identified adults with confirmed or clinically suspected neuroendocrine bone involvement who received a bone-modifying agent at a UK tertiary centre (January 2019-September 2024), using institutional prescribing records. Demographic, tumour, treatment, and toxicity data were extracted from records. Twenty-two patients received treatment (denosumab 17 [77%], zoledronic acid 5 [23%]). Most (91%) had grade 1-2 tumours; 64% had gastro-entero-pancreatic primaries. Bone metastases were synchronous in 46% and widespread (more than three lesions) in 73%. At diagnosis, 22% were symptomatic; during follow-up, 78% developed pain, high blood calcium, or a skeletal-related event. Skeletal-related events, a composite of pathological fracture, spinal cord compression, radiotherapy to bone, or orthopaedic surgery, occurred in 41% (radiotherapy alone in 36%); pain-relieving medication was used universally. Treatment was mainly given every 12 weeks (median six doses). Low blood calcium occurred in 9% and osteonecrosis of the jaw in 5%; dental assessment before therapy was recorded in only 9%. These figures are broadly consistent with the Italian survey cited above. Treatment use was heterogeneous, reflecting a lack of disease-specific guidelines, and toxicity was comparable to other solid tumours and generally manageable. Our findings highlight the need for prospective studies and structured registries to clarify treatment use, dosing, and impact on quality of life and prognosis.