Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2026

Measuring Fluxes of Mineral Nutrients and Toxicants in Plants with Radioactive Tracers
Published on: August 22, 2014
Guidelines to writing a review paper for the journal of environmental radioactivity
1University of Texas at Austin, Nuclear Engineering Teaching Lab, Walker Department of Mechanical Engineering, Pickle Research Campus R-9000, Austin, TX, 78712, USA.
Abstract:
The art of writing a good, meaningful and well-appreciated review paper for respective audiences is not an easy task to undertake. Often review papers have no hypothesis and are just a rehash of references, data, figures and tables with little inference to what future scientific directions need to be undertaken. On the other hand, some review manuscripts lack figures and tables and make reading cumbersome. There is a plethora of review styles in science, engineering technology, social sciences, business, etc. which can differ depending on the subject matter and journal expectations. This paper is a modest effort to outline guidelines to enhance the review contributions to the Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, (JENVR) while achieving a high standard of submission.
Related Concept Videos
Dual Nature of Electromagnetic (EM) Radiation
Wavelength is the distance between two consecutive peaks (the highest point) or troughs (the lowest point) in the wave. Frequency is the number of...
Microbial Bioremediation of Uranium
Bioremediation
Radioactive Decay and Radiometric Dating
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Overview
Types of Radioactivity
Alpha (α) decay is the emission of an α particle from the nucleus. For example, polonium-210 undergoes α decay:
