Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2026

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
Published on: January 23, 2017
Switch costs reveal vocal-specific executive demands during flexible action selection in crows
Diana A Liao1, Felix Kürble1, Andreas Nieder1
1Animal Physiology Unit, Institute of Neurobiology, University of Tübingen , Tübingen, Germany.
Abstract:
Crows and other corvids exhibit remarkable cognitive flexibility, exercising volitional control that allows them to select, initiate and withhold actions based on deliberate decisions rather than reflex. Among these behaviours, vocalizations are especially demanding, yet crows perform them with exceptional precision, paralleling core building blocks of human speech. Despite this, the executive mechanisms supporting intentional vocal control, and how they differ from those governing other voluntary actions, remain largely unknown. We trained carrion crows to produce either vocalizations or pecking responses to arbitrary visual cues presented in randomized, alternating or blocked sequences that controlled how often response modalities switched across trials. While crows performed both actions with high accuracy, vocalizations were consistently slower and more variable than pecking. Notably, vocalizations showed clear switch costs; transitions into vocal responses caused slower reaction times and occasional errors, whereas pecking was largely unaffected. These results show that crows can flexibly switch between motor modalities and that volitional vocalizations carry specific cognitive control demands, previously undescribed in birds. Crows thus stand out as a rare non-primate species in which volitional vocalizations integrate speed, accuracy and executive control.
Related Concept Videos
Early Vocalization During Infancy
Fixed Action Patterns
Nonconscious Mimicry
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Optimal Foraging

