Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 16, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Navigating Informant Discrepancies in Practice: A Qualitative Study on How Psychologists Manage Multi-Informant Data
Taehee Kim1, Mihyun Kim1, Michele Lease1
1Department of Educational Psychology, University of Georgia.
Objective:
This study aims to bridge the research-practice gap by exploring how practicing psychologists perceive and manage informant discrepancies when conducting comprehensive assessments of children and adolescents. We also sought to understand the challenges faced and resources utilized in addressing these discrepancies.
Method:
Semi-structured, in-depth interviews were conducted with thirteen licensed psychologists who work with youth in diverse applied settings (e.g. school, private clinic, hospital). Using the Needs-to-Goals Gap framework as our conceptual foundation, we employed both deductive and inductive coding approaches in qualitative thematic analysis.
Results:
Our study found that psychologists perceive informant discrepancies as common and expected features of assessment, yet they experience substantial clinical strain in certain cases - particularly when discrepancies arise in high-stakes clinical decisions or cannot be readily explained by available data (Themes 1-2). When interpreting multi-informant assessments, psychologists employed several interpretive approaches, including seeking consistency across informants, acknowledging divergent perspectives, and exploring potential confounds such as reporting biases (Themes 3-5). Psychologists described decision-making with discrepant information as an iterative process, with discrepant data often being used to inform diagnostic impressions and treatment planning (Themes 6-7). However, identified discrepancies were not always carried forward into treatment goals; instead, participants sometimes prioritized the primary presenting concerns that prompted the referral, reflecting a potential gap between need assessment and goal setting. Participants also described persistent challenges in communicating discrepancies with informants and noted limited access to practical resources or structured guidance for navigating discrepant information in practice (Themes 8-9).
Related Concept Videos
Naturalistic Observations
Ethics in Research
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Blind Procedures
Confirmation Biases
