Related Experiment Videos
Measures of Overall Illness Severity and Burden for ME/CFS: A Scoping Review
Jada Cripe1, Suvetha Ravichandran2, Samantha Deditz2
1Center for Community Research, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA. Jcripe1@depaul.edu.
Background And Objectives:
Consensus has not been established on measures of illness severity and burden for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), which is characterized by a wide range of symptoms including post-exertional malaise, unrefreshing sleep, and cognitive impairment. A scoping review was conducted to systematically evaluate the measurement of illness severity and burden in individuals with ME/CFS.
Methods:
A literature search was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines across five academic databases and one patient-organization-led website (with no restrictions on publication date; restricted to English language studies, and excluding review articles). Records were imported into Covidence, a systematic and scoping review data management tool, with studies retained if they evaluated an ME/CFS population and explicitly measured illness severity or illness burden. Information from each source was extracted and relevant measures were evaluated.
Results:
From the reviewed literature, 190 full-text articles met the final inclusion criteria and were retained for analysis. The most frequently utilized tools for evaluating illness severity and burden in individuals with ME/CFS were the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). Additional prominent instruments identified across the literature include disease-specific measures such as the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ) and generic health-related quality of life indices like the EuroQoL 5-Dimension (EQ-5D-5L).
Conclusions:
Significant discrepancies persist in how illness severity and illness burden are operationalized in ME/CFS research. The reliance on generic instruments often obscures core symptom domains like post-exertional malaise (PEM), while inconsistent standards limit cross-comparability. Establishing standardized, disease-specifici illness metrics is critical to accurately capturing the true burden of illness and advancing rigorous clinical research.
Related Concept Videos
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness, disability,...
Dimensions of Health and Illness
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History