Generative and Foundation-Model Artificial Intelligence in Food Safety Analysis, Authenticity Identification, and...

Generative and foundation-model artificial intelligence can strengthen food analysis, but computational performance does not establish decision readiness. This systematic review examines applications and validation requirements in food safety, authenticity, and quality control. A Scopus search on 13 June 2026 identified 438 records; 65 publications were retained, including 41 direct analytical reports and 24 supporting publications. Independent dual screening and coding supported thematic synthesis and descriptive evidence mapping. The direct core comprised 18 safety-related, 4 authenticity, 9 quality-related, and 10 adjacent-domain reports. Of these, 23 reported experimental or reference-method validation, 13 dataset/model evaluation, and 5 human, sensory, or expert assessment. None of the 41 direct reports documented prospective evaluation in a real industrial setting. This finding remained unchanged in narrower-scope analyses, although the balance among experimental, dataset/model, and human-assessment validation changed. The generated food-evidence transfer gap integrates established transfer problems with food-specific decision requirements. Five cumulative gates organize provenance, technical validity, food-science validity, human calibration, and deployment governance. The framework connects generative-AI evidence requirements to established analytical standards rather than replacing them. Decision readiness requires risk-proportionate evidence for a specified use, including applicable reference-method and regulatory requirements. These findings characterize the captured literature, not the complete industrial deployment landscape.