Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 18, 2026

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
Published on: September 11, 2011
Physics-informed machine learning-based dose calculation for patients undergoing fluoroscopically guided
Haegin Han1, Keith Griffin1, Monjoy Saha2
1Radiation Epidemiology Branch, National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, Maryland, 20850, United States.
Objective:
To develop and evaluate a physics-informed machine-learning framework for rapid organ-dose estimation in fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures without requiring patient-specific imaging. Approach: We used 385 adult radiation dose structured reports from three procedure types-bilateral carotid angiography, percutaneous biliary drainage, and liver chemoembolization-comprising more than 50,000 irradiation events. A body-size-matched computational phantom was selected using patient sex, height, and weight. RDSR-derived beam parameters and engineered descriptors of beam-organ geometry and attenuation were used to train organ-specific XGBoost models for localized organs and a multi-output multilayer perceptron model for four distributed tissues. Monte Carlo-derived dose coefficients from NCIRF3 were used as target values. Main results: In the held-out test set of 12,683 irradiation events, 49.4% and 84.8% of XGBoost-based localized-organ estimates were within ±5% and ±20% of the Monte Carlo-derived values, respectively. The corresponding proportions were 88.2% and 98.0% for the distributed-tissue estimates and 87.6% and 98.3% for detriment-weighted dose. The median relative prediction error across organs and tissues was 0.37% (interquartile range, -3.68% to 4.99%). A reliability score was developed to support uncertainty-aware interpretation. The framework required approximately 0.3 s per irradiation event, corresponding to an approximately 290-fold acceleration relative to conventional Monte Carlo simulation under the benchmark conditions. Significance: The proposed image-free framework enables rapid organ-dose estimation when patient imaging is unavailable and may support large retrospective epidemiological studies and uncertainty-aware dose monitoring. Because development and validation were limited to three procedure types and relied on reconstructed phantom-beam geometry, external validation is required before application to other procedures or high-precision individual clinical decisions.
