Related Experiment Videos
Mapping the complement-targeted landscape in igA nephropathy: a systematic review with structured descriptive
Xin-Yu Li1, Chang-Ying Zhong2, Li-Nan Zhang1
1Institute of Rehabilitation and Health Care, Hunan Traditional Chinese Medical College, Hunan, China.
Background:
Complement activation is a key driver of disease progression in IgA nephropathy (IgAN). While previous syntheses were limited to phase II evidence, pivotal phase III data-including the 24-month results of the APPLAUSE-IgAN trial-have recently emerged, necessitating an updated appraisal of complement-targeted therapies.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane up to April 24, 2026, for randomized controlled trials of complement inhibitors in adults with biopsy-proven IgA nephropathy. Due to marked mechanistic heterogeneity across agents targeting distinct complement nodes, a quantitative meta-analysis was not performed. Instead, we performed a structured descriptive synthesis, a predefined, domain-based comparative method, focusing on efficacy signals, safety profiles, and methodological disparities across trials.
Results:
Four RCTs comprising 584 patients were included, representing factor B and C5 inhibition. The phase III iptacopan trial demonstrated robust proteinuria reduction, eGFR slope attenuation, and a decreased risk of kidney failure, but a higher serious-infection rate and confirmed pneumococcal infections highlighted that alternative-pathway inhibition attenuates rather than abolishes encapsulated-bacteria risk. Phase II trials of ravulizumab, iptacopan, and cemdisiran provided early efficacy signals with no encapsulated-bacterial events reported, though small size and short follow-up limit safety inference. All trials required prophylactic vaccination, and infection-risk obligations differed by target-terminal-pathway inhibitors carrying the strictest REMS requirements. Methodological heterogeneity-particularly regarding biopsy timing and fibrosis exclusion-emerged as a major barrier to cross-trial comparisons. Beyond these RCTs, a dynamic pipeline of ASO, siRNA, and small-molecule inhibitors continues to evolve.
Conclusion:
Complement inhibitors show promising but heterogeneous signals across individual trials; however, marked differences in molecular targets, trial design, and eligibility preclude any inference of a uniform class effect. Infection risk mitigation differs by complement target-terminal-pathway inhibitors carry the highest encapsulated-bacterial burden and strictest regulatory constraints, whereas alternative-pathway inhibitors preserve partial vaccine-mediated defence but still require comprehensive vaccination and surveillance. These observations are hypothesis-generating and underscore the need for mechanism-specific phase III programmes with hard renal endpoints and individual patient-level meta-analyses to advance precision complement therapeutics in IgAN.
Systematic Review Registration:
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261385690.
Related Concept Videos
Nephrotic Syndrome I : Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Acute Kidney Injury II: Pathophysiology
Renal Drug Clearance: Overview
Renal clearance can be calculated using different methods. One approach is to divide the urinary drug excretion rate by the plasma drug concentration. This method directly measures renal clearance, indicating the kidneys' efficiency in...
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Diabetic Nephropathy