Related Experiment Videos
Ambient Artificial Intelligent Scribes in Oncology: Impact on Clinician Experience and Documentation Burden
Abigail E Baldwin-Medsker1, Susan Chimonas2, Suryan P Goyal3
1Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Purpose:
Ambient artificial intelligence (AI) scribes, widely implemented to reduce clinician burden and dissatisfaction, are not optimized for oncology. We evaluated this technology at-scale at a high-volume cancer center.
Methods:
This prospective mixed-methods study used surveys, electronic health record (EHR), and utilization data to assess adoption, burden, and satisfaction with an ambient AI scribe that was implemented from June to September 2025. Descriptive statistics categorized clinicians as adopters (3+ weeks of use), attempted adopters (1-2 weeks), and never-users (0 weeks). Generalized estimating equations assessed the adoption's effect on the likelihood of closing notes on visit days and pajama time. Pre- and postimplementation surveys obtained clinicians' insights into satisfaction and documentation burden.
Results:
In all, 190 (19.8%) of 958 clinicians used the tool, most often with new, video, and in-person visits. Adopters (n = 124) and attempted adopters (n = 66) were more commonly physicians from medicine and surgery. Pre- to post-rollout, the likelihood of closing notes on visit days remained unchanged among never-users (70% v 70%) and decreased among attempted adopters (73% v 70%) and adopters (56% v 54%). Pajama time remained unchanged among attempted adopters (50.6 v 50.1 minutes per week) and decreased among never-users (69.5 v 62.2) and adopters (86.9 v 81.4). Clinicians completing both pre- and postrollout surveys (n = 45) showed a decrease in high/excessive note-writing time (78% v 60%; P = .043). Postrollout surveys (n = 77) showed largely positive experiences, with 73% reporting they would recommend the tool to colleagues.
Conclusion:
This study of an ambient AI scribe at-scale showed positive satisfaction but mixed burden outcomes among oncology clinicians. Notably, despite enterprise-wide implementation and training, adoption was low and varied by clinician and visit characteristics. Future research should explore adoption barriers and tool optimization to support oncology documentation workflows.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
Legal Guidelines for Documentation
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...