Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2026

Preparation of Fungal and Plant Materials for Structural Elucidation Using Dynamic Nuclear Polarization Solid-State NMR
Published on: February 12, 2019
Cell wall polymer interactions, rather than polysaccharide fine structure, underlie recalcitrance in energy cane
Adriana Grandis1, Débora Pagliuso1, Marina C M Martins1
1Laboratory of Plant Physiological Ecology, Department of Botany. Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, Brazil. Rua do Matão, 277, SP, 05508-090.
Abstract:
Second-generation bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass has driven the development of high-fiber sugarcane varieties known as energy canes, which combine high tillering, high biomass accumulation, lower sucrose, and improved agronomic performance. However, energy canes have been reported to be more recalcitrant to enzymatic saccharification. We compared biomass and cell wall composition, non-cellulosic polysaccharide extractability, and saccharification efficiency in two energy cane varieties, Vertix V2 and Vertix V3, and sugarcane. Sugarcane contained three times as much sucrose and less fiber than energy canes. After removing soluble sugars from the biomass, reduced digestibility became evident in the two energy cane varieties, particularly in V2. Saccharification increased with alkali and doubled after acidic sodium chlorite treatments. Although the main polysaccharides and linkage structures were broadly conserved across genotypes, minor changes were observed in their relative abundance and extractability. Glucuronoarabinoxylans (GAX) were the predominant wall polysaccharides (72%), while pectins [homogalacturonan (HG) and rhamnogalacturonan I (RG-I), each 1%], arabinan side-groups (4-6%), glucomannans (1%), and xyloglucan (2-4%) occurred in smaller proportions. Sugarcane contained higher abundances of xyloglucan, β-glucan, glucomannan, and arabinan, whereas energy canes had higher HG and RG-I. Chlorite oxidation solubilized GAX and RG-I, indicating that polymers are associated with phenylpropanoids and contribute to wall recalcitrance. The contrasting saccharification behavior of the sugarcane and energy cane varieties examined here appears to arise not from major changes in polysaccharide fine structure, but from differences in biomass allocation, phenylpropanoid abundance, extractability, and molecular interactions among cellulose, matrix polysaccharides, and phenylpropanoids within the cell wall. Understanding these properties in relation to enzyme-mediated disassembly is fundamental to accessing grass walls and improving biomass saccharification.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cellulose and Pectic Polysaccharides
As a cell matures, its cell wall specializes according to its type. For example, the parenchyma cells of...
Cell Adhesion in Plants
Pectins are complex heteropolymers mainly composed of negatively-charged α-D-glucopyranosyl uronic acid and some neutral glycosyl residues such as α-L-rhamnopyranose, α-L-arabinofuranose, and...
Plant Cell Wall
Plant Cell Wall
Role of Microtubules in Cell Wall Deposition
Chemistry of Carbohydrates

