Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 20, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Evaluating Classifier Derivation and Validation Beyond the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve
Jeffrey Michael Franc1,2,3, Samuel J Stratton4
1Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract:
The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) summarizes a classifier's discrimination across all possible thresholds, but it does not establish calibration, clinical utility, or performance at the threshold used in practice. This editorial explains the interpretation and limitations of AUROC using a hypothetical genomic enzyme test for susceptibility to symptomatic COVID-19. It emphasizes that threshold selection must be justified according to the intended use, outcome prevalence, and consequences of false-positive and false-negative results. Threshold derivation and validation should be treated as separate processes, and performance should be evaluated in independent or appropriately internally validated data. Reporting should generally include sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals and the complete confusion matrix, from a validation dataset. AUROC P-values should receive limited emphasis; effect magnitude, precision, and decision-relevant performance are more informative.
Related Concept Videos
Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Calibration Curves: Correlation Coefficient
Sieve Analysis and Grading Curves