Related Experiment Videos
Comparison of dexmedetomidine and droperidol-fentanyl for asleep-awake-asleep techniques in awake craniotomy
Xiaomei Yang1,2, Dongdong Qu1,3, Yiyan Ren1,4
1Department of Anesthesiology, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, 250012, China.
Background:
In this study, we aimed to compare dexmedetomidine with droperidol-fentanyl during the intraoperative awakening phase of awake craniotomy (AC), focusing on wake-up time.
Methods:
We conducted a single-center randomized controlled trial in China from January 2018 to December 2018. Patients aged 36-60 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II, scheduled for brain glioma resection, were screened for eligibility; 61 were randomized, and 60 were included in the final analysis. The patients were randomized to either the dexmedetomidine group (intravenous loading dose of dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg·kg- 1 after discontinuation of propofol and remifentanil, followed by a maintenance infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.3-0.5 µg·kg- 1·h- 1) or the droperidol-fentanyl group (intravenous loading doses of fentanyl 2 µg·kg- 1 and droperidol 5 mg after discontinuation of propofol and remifentanil, followed by continuous maintenance infusions of fentanyl 2 µg·kg- 1·h- 1 and droperidol 0.1 mg·kg- 1·h- 1). A wake-up assessment was performed during maintenance of the assigned study regimen. The primary outcome measure was wake-up time. Secondary outcomes included the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), eloquent brain area mapping status, vital signs, and adverse events.
Results:
Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. Compared with the droperidol-fentanyl group, the dexmedetomidine group had lower mean arterial pressure at T4-T7, lower heart rate at T1-T4 and T7, and a shorter wake-up time, with a between-group difference of 3.5 min (95% CI, 1.95 to 5.05; P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were detected in OAA/S scores at wake-up (T2), NRS scores, eloquent area mapping status, or adverse events between the groups.
Conclusion:
No statistically significant differences were detected in OAA/S scores at wake-up or intraoperative brain mapping performance between the two groups. The dexmedetomidine regimen was associated with a shorter measured wake-up time.
Trial Registration:
The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800014329) was retrospectively registered on 6 January 2018.
Related Concept Videos
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Stages of General Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
General Anesthesia: Overview
General anesthesia induces unconsciousness in the whole body, while the others target specific areas or sensations. It is administered to minimize adverse effects, maintain...
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics