Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 22, 2026

In Situ SIMS and IR Spectroscopy of Well-defined Surfaces Prepared by Soft Landing of Mass-selected Ions
Published on: June 16, 2014
Interfacial Confinement Enables Dual Hosting of Sulfur Mustard and Mustard Sulfoxide in NU-1000
Farrah S McCormick1, Liangliang Huang1,2
1School of Sustainable Chemical, Biological and Materials Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma73019, United States.
Abstract:
Zirconium-based metal-organic frameworks have emerged as promising materials for the capture and detoxification of chemical warfare agents, but the molecular mechanism by which a hierarchical MOF differentiates a hydrophobic reactant from its oxidized product remains incompletely understood. Here, we use molecular dynamics simulations, grand-canonical Monte Carlo adsorption calculations, and periodic density functional theory to examine the dual-hosting behavior of NU-1000 toward sulfur mustard (HD) and mustard sulfoxide (HDO). Rather than treating NU-1000 only as an adsorbent or oxidation catalyst, we resolve how its internal micropore, mesopore, and c-pore interfaces impose distinct confinement environments on reactant and product species. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations show that HD binds most favorably in the c-pore region, with a binding energy of approximately -12.5 kcal/mol, and similarly favorable stabilization in confined micropore environments, whereas substantially weaker binding is observed in the mesopore. Molecular dynamics simulations also reveal sharply different pore residence patterns: HD localizes predominantly in micropores, occupying this region for ∼80% of the trajectory, while HDO samples larger pore environments more broadly, with ∼45% mesopore and ∼34% c-pore occupancy. This pore-selective behavior persists under mixed HD/HDO coadsorption conditions, demonstrating that reactant-product differentiation is intrinsic to the NU-1000 pore network rather than an artifact of isolated single-component simulations. Radial distribution functions further show that HD is stabilized by dispersion-dominated confinement and weak halogen-hydrogen contacts, whereas HDO is governed by more localized, orientation-dependent interactions with hydrated zirconium node sites. These interaction differences produce a pronounced transport asymmetry, with HDO exhibiting a self-diffusion coefficient of 10.6 ± 2.11 × 10-10 m2/s compared with 0.5 ± 0.09 × 10-10 m2/s for HD at comparable loading. The results identify NU-1000 as a dual-function molecular host that couples reactant retention with product mobility, providing an interface-level mechanism relevant to selective CWA detoxification and confined transport in hierarchical porous catalysts.
Related Concept Videos
Preparation and Reactions of Sulfides
Chirality at Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Sulfur
A consequence of chirality is the need for enantiomeric resolution. While this is theoretically possible for all...
Cycloaddition Reactions: MO Requirements for Thermal Activation
¹H NMR: Complex Splitting
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied first.

