Related Experiment Videos
A competency-based assessment system for undergraduate oral and maxillofacial surgery internship: development and
Yan-Yan Zhang1, Shuang Yang2, Wen-Bo Zhang2
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, No.22, Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, China. zyyerist0903@163.com.
Background:
Traditional assessment in undergraduate oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) internships mostly relies on single-skill examinations, focusing only on technical proficiency while ignoring communication ability, clinical reasoning and medical documentation. This study aimed to develop and pilot-validate a comprehensive competency-based assessment system for undergraduate OMFS outpatient internships.
Methods:
This mixed-methods development and pilot validation study identified six core clinical competency domains through literature review and semi-structured interviews with five senior OMFS faculty members. A multi-dimensional assessment framework was established, including theoretical examination, integrated clinical operation evaluation, phased skill assessment aligned with national licensing standards, patient-related indicators and daily performance evaluation. Forty-six students in the development cohort (2024-2025) adopted the new system; 48 students in the reference cohort (2023-2024) received traditional assessment. Each student was independently evaluated by three faculty members from an eleven-person rater panel. Inter-rater reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Questionnaire feedback and adverse event data were compared between groups.
Results:
Six core competency domains were finalized. Student ratings of the comprehensiveness of the two assessment systems were not significantly different (8.14 vs. 6.52, P = 0.086). Faculty ratings showed a significant difference in comprehensiveness (9.64 vs. 6.28, P = 0.043). The overall inter-rater reliability was good (ICC = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.87). Based on participant feedback, the weight of theoretical examination and patient satisfaction was reduced, and more objective indicators were added. No significant between-group differences were found in adverse event incidence.
Trial Registration:
Not applicable.