Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 24, 2026

From a 2DE-Gel Spot to Protein Function: Lesson Learned From HS1 in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
Published on: October 19, 2014
Current perspectives on high-risk genomic profiles in chronic myeloid leukemia: from bench to clinical practice
Mohamed Isam Sharif1,2, Agustina Maria Perusini1,2, Hassan Sibai1,2
1Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, 610 University Avenue, OPG Room 6-222, Toronto, ON, M5G 2M9, Canada.
Abstract:
Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is defined by BCR::ABL1 rearrangement, yet its genomic architecture extends well beyond this single driver. High-risk genomic profiles (HGP)-additional chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia-positive cells, Philadelphia chromosome-associated rearrangements, and high-risk somatic mutations detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS)-are present at diagnosis in roughly one-third of chronic-phase (CP) patients and shape response, progression, and survival. We propose a clinically actionable taxonomy of HGP based on biological origin, detection method, and TKI sensitivity. Central to it is ASXL1, the most consequential somatic variant in CML. ASXL1 mutations are present in 7-14% of newly diagnosed CP patients and independently predict inferior response, treatment failure, and ABL1 kinase domain mutations, even with potent frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including asciminib. By contrast, the adverse impact of Ph-associated rearrangements is overcome by potent TKIs. A newly described sixth pattern of mutation dynamics-de novo DTA (DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1) mutations in 24% of optimal responders with a median doubling time of 68 days-supports serial NGS monitoring every 6-7 months as a noninvasive complement to cytogenetics. We present a practical decision framework across the key management nodes of CML: diagnosis, monitoring, treatment failure, and blast phase.
