Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 24, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Provider Knowledge and Utilization of Anal Cancer Screening: A Single Institution Cross-Sectional Survey Study
Saige Gitlin1, Crystal Mehdizadeh2, Alexandr Trifonov3
1Mass General Brigham OBGYN, Boston, MA, USA. sagitlin@mgh.harvard.edu.
Abstract:
In 2024, the International Anal Neoplasia Society (IANS) published the first consensus guidelines for anal cancer screening, outlining recommendations for patients who are most impacted by anal cancer. This study assesses provider knowledge and practice of these guidelines. A 37-item cross-sectional survey was distributed electronically to physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants across ten specialties within a single health system. The survey assessed familiarity with anal cytology, guideline knowledge, screening practices, and barriers to screening. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses compared primary care providers (PCPs) to subspecialists. 87 providers completed the survey (62% physicians, 21% nurse practitioners, 17% physician assistants); 60% were Primary Care Physicians (PCPs) and 40% subspecialists. 55% had never heard of the IANS guidelines, and 76% had never performed an anal Pap test. Among the 70 providers completing the knowledge assessment, the median score was 10/20 (Inter Quartile Range (IQR) 8-12). Providers performed worst when identifying screening recommendations for solid organ transplant recipients (7% correct) and cisgender women with HIV (13% correct). No significant differences were found between PCPs and subspecialists across any measure. Qualitative responses identified scope of practice uncertainty (78%), lack of training (20%), and limited access to high-resolution anoscopy (9%) as primary barriers. Provider knowledge and utilization of anal cancer screening guidelines remain critically low across specialties. These findings highlight the urgent need for institution-wide education, standardized ordering pathways, and clear referral processes to improve screening rates.