Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 24, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
How to evaluate participatory action research for health promotion interventions: the pragmatic Emke framework
Helga Emke1,2,3, Mai Chinapaw4,5, Coosje Dijkstra4,5
1Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. h.emke@amsterdamumc.nl.
Purpose:
Participatory Action Research (PAR) is a promising approach to increase the effectiveness and impact of health promotion interventions. Evaluating the process of developing and implementing co-created interventions can provide important insights in barriers, facilitators and potential impact of a PAR approach. To date, a framework guiding the process evaluation of developing and implementing actions using a PAR approach is lacking. This study aimed to develop a pragmatic framework to guide the process evaluation of a PAR approach for the development and implementation of health promotion actions, as part of the Lifestyle Innovations Based on Youth Knowledge and Experience (LIKE) study.
Methods:
The framework we developed, called the Emke framework, is primarily based on the RE-AIM framework (1999) as the RE-AIM framework has previously been successfully used to evaluate the process of conducting PAR to develop and implement actions. Additionally, the Emke framework is based on the framework of Saunders et al. (2005) which is commonly used in the process evaluation of health promotion interventions. Elements that would complement the Emke framework specifically focussing on the evaluation of PAR, were added from the Dutch PAR quality framework by Jurrius (2013) listing important requirements of conducting PAR approach with youth and the position paper by Wright et al. (2013) that describes eleven essential characteristics of high-quality PAR in health research.
Results:
The Emke framework consists of seven elements related to the process evaluation of (1) conducting PAR and (2) the implementation of co-created actions, which are both iterative processes. These elements include: preconditions, recruitment, participants, adoption, iterative implementation, perceived effects, and sustainability. All elements are applicable to both the process evaluation of conducting PAR and implementation co-created actions, yet their application differs.
Conclusions:
This is the first framework specifically designed to guide the process evaluation of PAR projects. Systematic process evaluations of PAR projects will gain a better understanding of barriers, facilitators and potential impact of PAR projects. We hope that the Emke framework will prove useful to researchers in future PAR projects.
Related Concept Videos
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results from...
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...
