Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 24, 2026

A Comparative Approach for Quantitative Cell Counting Studies in Widely Different Mammalian Brains
Published on: January 16, 2026
Complexity counts: global and local perspectives on Indo-Aryan numeral systems
1Institute for the Interdisciplinary Study of Language Evolution , University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Abstract:
The numeral systems of Indo-Aryan languages such as Hindi, Gujarati, and Bengali are highly unusual in that unlike most numeral systems (e.g., those of English, Chinese, etc.), forms referring to 1-99 are highly non-transparent and cannot be constructed using straightforward rules for forming combinations of tens and digits. Importantly, this non-transparency is not, as in some languages tolerating a mild degree of irregularity (e.g., Spanish catorce '14', cuarenta '40', which are not transparent combinations of cuatro '4' and diez '10'), limited to the teens and decade forms. As an example, Hindi/Urdu ikyānve '91' is not decomposable into the composite elements ek 'one' and nave 'ninety' in the way that its English counterpart is. This paper further clarifies the position of Indo-Aryan languages within the typology of numeral systems, and explores the linguistic and non-linguistic factors that may be responsible for the persistence of complex systems in these languages. Using data from multiple databases, we develop and employ a number of cross-linguistically applicable metrics to quantify the complexity of languages' numeral systems, and demonstrate that Indo-Aryan languages have decisively more complex numeral systems than the world's languages as a whole, though individual Indo-Aryan languages differ from each other in terms of the complexity of the patterns they display. We investigate the factors (e.g., religion, geographic isolation, etc.) that underlie complexity in numeral systems, with a focus on South Asia, in an attempt to develop an account of why complex numeral systems developed and persisted in certain Indo-Aryan languages but not elsewhere. Finally, we demonstrate that Indo-Aryan numeral systems adhere to certain general pressures toward efficient communication found cross-linguistically, despite their high complexity. We call for this somewhat overlooked dimension of complexity to be taken seriously when discussing general variation in numeral systems.
Related Concept Videos
Preoperational Thought IV: Numbers
Nominal Level of Measurement
The data that cannot be measured but can be grouped into categories fall under the nominal level of measurement. Data that is measured using a nominal scale is...
How Data are Classified: Numerical Data
Quantitative data may be either discrete or continuous. All quantitative data that take on only specific numerical...
Real Number Operations
Numerical Calculations
The solution to a problem is obtained using different methods. While manually solving algebraic symbols is one of the most common methods, the graphical method is often preferred. Computers...
Relating Angular And Linear Quantities - II

