Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2026

Doppler Ultrasound-Based Leg Blood Flow Assessment During Single-Leg Knee-Extensor Exercise in an Uncontrolled Setting
Published on: December 15, 2023
An Automated Blood Flow Restriction Device Is Reliable, but Not Valid, for Determining Lower Limb Occlusion Pressure
Daniel Lang1,2, Xaver Fallo1,2, Hunter Bennett1,2
1School of Allied Health and Human Performance, Adelaide University, Adelaide, Australia; and.
Abstract:
Lang, D, Fallo, X, and Bennett, H. An automated blood flow restriction device is reliable, but not valid, for determining lower limb occlusion pressure in resistance-trained adults. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-Blood flow restriction (BFR) exercise can improve strength, hypertrophy, and aerobic performance. Accurate limb occlusion pressure (LOP) assessment is essential for safe prescription. The AirBands is a novel automated BFR device that estimates LOP using integrated sensors, making LOP assessment easier. However, its validity and reliability are not well established in resistance-trained individuals. This study evaluated the concurrent validity of the AirBands compared with a handheld Doppler ultrasound for lower limb LOP, and its test-retest reliability, in resistance-trained adults. Twenty-six resistance-trained adults (14 males, 12 females; 24.2 ± 4.7 years) participated. For validity, LOP was measured using AirBands and Doppler in randomized order, using the same cuff. For reliability, automated LOP was measured twice, 10 minutes apart. Agreement was assessed using Bland-Altman limits of agreement and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). No significant difference was observed between manual (231.7 ± 17.8 mm Hg) and automated (230.8 ± 38.3 mm Hg) LOP (mean difference -0.8 mm Hg; p = 0.928), although validity ICC was poor (0.236, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.293 to 0.641). Bland-Altman analysis indicated proportional bias, with overestimation at lower values and underestimation at higher values. Reliability showed no significant difference between test 1 (243.0 ± 37.5 mm Hg) and test 2 (242.3 ± 40.5 mm Hg) (mean difference 1.0 mm Hg; p = 0.816) and good reliability (ICC = 0.862, 95% CI = 0.715 to 0.936). AirBands demonstrates good test-retest reliability but poor concurrent validity vs. Doppler ultrasound. Clinicians should confirm automated values using a Doppler ultrasound before prescribing BFR.
Related Concept Videos
Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Measurement of Blood Pressure
Assessing Blood pressure in the Leg
Preparation:
Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...