Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2026

Achieving Efficient Fragment Screening at XChem Facility at Diamond Light Source
Published on: May 29, 2021
Benchmarking Core-Level X-ray Absorption with MRSF-TDDFT, RASPT2, and Stochastic GAS Using the XABOOM Set
Marc Alías-Rodríguez1, Francesco Montorsi2, Woojin Park3
1Departament de Química Física i Inorgànica, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona43007, Spain.
Abstract:
Rapid advances in X-ray free-electron laser facilities are producing X-ray absorption spectra (XAS) with unprecedented detail, creating a pressing need for theoretical methods that are both accurate and computationally efficient to interpret subtle spectral features. In this study, we benchmark two cost-effective electronic-structure approaches for an accurate description of XAS spectra: mixed-reference spin-flip time-dependent density-functional theory (MRSF-TDDFT) and single- and (extended) multistate restricted active-space perturbation theory (SS/(X)MS-RASPT2). We apply these methods to the near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) of small and medium-sized organic molecules from the XABOOM test set [J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 1618-1637 (2021)]. We show that MRSF-TDDFT and SS/(X)MSRASPT2 yield average errors below 0.5 eV for the lowest bright transitions compared with available gas-phase experimental K-edge spectra and reproduce both excitation energies and relative intensities across the full preionization region with excellent agreement. Furthermore, we introduce the Stochastic Generalized Active Space (S-GAS) method as a high-level tool to simulate XAS spectra and apply it to a subset of the XABOOM data set. In addition to providing accurate spectra, the S-GAS method serves as a benchmark for assessing the performance of the more approximate electronic-structure approaches. Taken together, these methods offer a robust framework for simulating XAS spectra, allowing us to systematically analyze the influence of orbital relaxation, core-valence separation, basis-set size, configuration space restrictions, relativistic effects, and vibrational zero-point energy. These findings provide practical guidelines for achieving high accuracy at reduced computational cost and for enabling more reliable interpretation of experimental NEXAFS features.
More Related Videos
08:53Biochemical and Structural Characterization of the Carbohydrate Transport Substrate-binding-protein SP0092
Published on: October 2, 2017
06:49In situ Grazing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering on Roll-To-Roll Coating of Organic Solar Cells with Laboratory X-ray Instrumentation
Published on: March 2, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Atomization Methods
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Radiation and Light Sources
Two common narrow-range 'line' sources used in AAS are hollow-cathode lamps (HCLs) and...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Overview
When irradiated by EMR of a particular wavelength, these...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Lab
Solutions containing organic solvents, such as low-molecular-mass alcohols, esters, or ketones, enhance absorbances by increasing nebulizer...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Instrumentation
The atomizer used in AAS can be either a flame atomizer or an...
Molecular Spectroscopy: Absorption and Emission