Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2026

Tuning the Acidity of Pt/ CNTs Catalysts for Hydrodeoxygenation of Diphenyl Ether
Published on: August 17, 2019
Ni3(HITP)2@PTFE Molecular Fence Enables Selective C2 Coupling in Methane Contact-Electro-Catalysis
Chuan-Qi Shen1, Fulin Wang1, Xin Li1
1State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Innovation Laboratory for Sciences and Technologies of Energy Materials of Fujian Province (IKKEM), Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Abstract:
Contact-Electro-Catalysis (CEC) enables methane activation under ambient conditions; however, the poorly understood interfacial active sites and uncontrolled evolution of reactive radical intermediates cause methane conversion to remain dominated by C1 oxygenation rather than selective C─C coupling. Herein, we assemble the established Ni3(HITP)2 framework (HITP = 2,3,6,7,10,11-hexaiminotriphenylene) on PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene) to construct a molecular fence interface integrating Ni-N4 sites with spatial confinement for selective C2 coupling. During CEC, contact electrification at the PTFE-water interface supports radical generation for methane conversion, while the coupled Ni-N4 sites further facilitate O2 activation and modulate reactive species utilization. Simultaneously, the porous Ni3(HITP)2 outer layer shows enhanced CH4 uptake near the charged interface and is proposed to favor C─C coupling by promoting local methane enrichment and retention of methane-derived intermediates. As a result, methane conversion is redirected from C1 oxygenation toward selective C2 coupling under ambient conditions, delivering a C2 yield of 0.58 mmol g-1 h-1 with 82.4% selectivity. In situ spectroscopy and density functional theory calculations support a mechanistic model in which interfacial Ni-N4 sites and the porous framework jointly influence reactive-species utilization and methane-derived intermediate reactions, favoring pathway-selective methane CEC.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Reduction of Alkynes to cis-Alkenes: Catalytic Hydrogenation
Like alkenes, alkynes can be reduced to alkanes in the presence of transition metal catalysts such as Pt, Pd, or Ni. The reaction involves two sequential syn additions of hydrogen via a cis-alkene intermediate.
meta-Directing Deactivators: –NO2, –CN, –CHO, –⁠CO2R, –COR, –CO2H
¹H NMR: Long-Range Coupling
In alkenes, spin information is communicated via σ–π overlap, as seen in allylic (four-bond) and homoallylic (five-bond) couplings. These coupling interactions are stronger when the σ bond is parallel to the alkene π orbitals.

