Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2026

Breakfast Habits among Schoolchildren in the City of Uruguaiana, Brazil
Published on: July 29, 2020
Institutional capacity to acquire, assess, adapt and apply evidence in Brazil: a mixed-methods study, 2024
Aurelina Aguiar de Lima1, Antonia Angulo-Tuesta1, Eliane Maria Medeiros Leal2
1Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde, Brasília, DF, Brazil Universidade de Brasília Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologias em Saúde BrasíliaDF Brazil.
Objective:
To evaluate the institutional capacity of the Health Ministry's Health Science, Technology and Innovation and Economic-Industrial Complex Secretariat (Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação e do Complexo Econômico-Industrial da Saúde - SECTICS/MS) in using scientific evidence in decision-making.
Methods:
This was a two-phase mixed-methods study conducted between August and September 2024 in the five SECTICS/MS departments. Data were collected through questionnaires, based on the Brazilian version of the "4A Tool", which assesses four dimensions: Acquiring, Assessing, Adapting and Applying evidence, and were quantified using SPSS software (version 30).
Results:
Of the 15 representatives invited, 12 participated in the quantitative phase (phase 1). Of these, 4 agreed to participate in the qualitative phase (phase 2). The majority held a doctorate (67%), were civil servants (75%) and had worked for five years or more at the Ministry of Health (67%). All reported being familiar with evidence-informed policies. The "acquire" (82%) and "assess" (72%) dimensions showed high agreement, indicating consolidated institutional capacity. The "apply" dimension had (63.0%) agreement, while the "adapt" dimension had the lowest (47%), highlighting weaknesses. Participants stressed the importance of evidence for process optimization but pointed to inequalities between departments and structural limitations, such as lack of time, barriers to accessing articles and absence of knowledge translation tools.
Conclusion:
This study showed progress in institutional capacities to acquire and assess evidence. However, there remains a need to strengthen the adaptation and application of evidence, especially through investments in knowledge translation that bring evidence, managers and the public closer together.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Longitudinal Research
Social-Contextual Approach
