Related Experiment Videos
From digital attitudes to online learning engagement: serial indirect associations through digital literacy and
Qing Liu1, Yujie Wei2, Rui Guo3
1Research Office, Chongqing Industry and Information Vocational College, Chongqing, China.
Background:
Engagement with online learning depends not only on access to digital media but also on students' evaluations of these media, perceived competence, and confidence. This study examined the statistical indirect associations linking digital attitudes with online learning engagement through digital literacy and digital self-efficacy.
Methods:
A cross-sectional, anonymous survey was completed by 548 students from four vocational colleges in southwest China. A hierarchical measurement model was estimated from all 38 item-level responses: digital literacy and online engagement were specified as second-order constructs through three and four first-order dimensions, respectively, whereas digital attitude and digital self-efficacy were first-order constructs measured directly by their items. Control-adjusted indirect effects were evaluated with 5,000 bootstrap resamples.
Results:
In the latent-variable model, digital attitudes were positively associated with digital literacy (β = 0.792, p < 0.001) and online engagement (β = 0.263, p < 0.001). Digital literacy was strongly associated with digital self-efficacy (β = 0.906, p < 0.001), and both digital literacy (β = 0.330, p = 0.001) and digital self-efficacy (β = 0.369, p < 0.001) were associated with engagement. The attitude-self-efficacy path was not significant in the latent model. In the control-adjusted composite-score analysis, the very small self-efficacy-only indirect effect had a confidence-interval lower bound of 0.00005; given its inconsistency with the latent model, H7 was not regarded as robustly supported. Under the common-latent-factor sensitivity specification, the literacy-only interval narrowly excluded zero, whereas the serial interval included zero.
Conclusion:
The findings are consistent with indirect associations involving closely related competence and confidence perceptions, not with two clearly independent psychological mechanisms. Because the study was cross-sectional and relied on one self-report survey, the reported paths are associative rather than causal; exact-fit rejection, common-method risk, limited separation between digital literacy and self-efficacy, and sensitivity of the serial indirect effect also warrant caution.
Related Concept Videos
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication
Self-Efficacy
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback
Role-Based Identity