Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Understanding veteran perspectives surrounding implantable cardioverter- defibrillator decision-making
Gretchen C Stage1,2, Marcie Lee1,2, Jazmin I Beltran1,2
1Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation, Veterans Health Administration, Aurora, CO, United States of America.
Background:
In 2018, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) mandated the use of evidence-based shared decision-making (SDM) tools for cardiovascular decisions, including implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation for primary prevention in patients with systolic heart failure. Military Veterans are a unique population with experiences including combat, and heightened rates of anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder. Understanding Veteran perspectives on ICD decision-making processes is necessary to inform the Veteran Health Administration's (VHA) ICD care model.
Study Objective:
To understand factors influencing Veterans' ICD decision-making, semi-structured interviews were conducted with Veteran patients with an ICD (Implanters), those referred for consideration (Deliberators), and those who declined (Decliners).
Methods:
Interviews explored experiences with being offered an ICD, understanding of the device, and factors influencing personal decisions. Data were analyzed using content and thematic analysis.
Results:
Interviews with 13 participants revealed four primary themes that guided ICD decision-making: (1) desire for information and involvement in personal decisions, (2) quality of life values, (3) views of spirituality (4) Decliners and Deliberators accepted natural death and expressed desire to not intervene medically to prolong life.Participants valued consultation with providers and personal networks, yet ultimately prioritized autonomy. The role of mental health experiences and cohort-level differences on decision-making was inconclusive.
Conclusion:
Participants' ICD implantation decision-making were influenced by considerations around quality of life, spiritual beliefs, and reluctance to invasively interfere with disease progression. These insights highlight the importance of personalized patient-provider interactions and the need for decision-support tools tailored to VHA Veteran care.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management

