Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2026

Pre-clinical Evaluation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Acute Leukemia
Published on: September 18, 2013
Menin Inhibitors in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: From Molecular Rationale to Clinical Practice
Caterina Alati1, Matteo Molica2, Martina Pitea1
1Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Cellular Therapies Unit (CTMO), Department of Hemato-Oncology and Radiotherapy, Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, 89133 Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Abstract:
Background: Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) harboring KMT2A rearrangements (KMT2Ar) or NPM1 mutations (mNPM1) constitutes a substantial and molecularly coherent subset of AML characterized by aberrant activation of homeobox (HOX) gene programs driven by the menin-MLL transcriptional complex. Disruption of this interaction through small-molecule menin inhibitors represents a compelling therapeutic strategy. Methods: We conducted a narrative (non-systematic) review of the clinical literature on four menin inhibitors-revumenib, ziftomenib, bleximenib, and enzomenib-as monotherapy and in combination regimens, identified through PubMed/MEDLINE and conference abstract searches (ASH, EHA) without a pre-specified systematic search protocol, as detailed in the Introduction. Results: Revumenib received FDA approval in November 2024 for relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute leukemia with a KMT2A translocation (an indication not restricted by lineage; the pivotal cohort included AML, ALL and MPAL), demonstrating a CR + CRh rate of 21.2% in the pivotal AUGMENT-101 trial, and a second FDA approval followed in October 2025 for R/R mNPM1 AML. In R/R mNPM1 AML (cohort 2C), an overall response rate (ORR) of 46.9% was observed. Ziftomenib achieved its primary phase II endpoint in R/R mNPM1 AML (CR/CRh 23%, p = 0.0058 vs. historical control) and received FDA approval (as Komzifti) in November 2025 for the same indication. Combination strategies with venetoclax/azacitidine have shown high response rates in small, non-randomized newly diagnosed cohorts (ORR approximately 88-94%), although the contribution of the menin inhibitor cannot be established without randomized data. Bleximenib and enzomenib show similarly encouraging early-phase signals. Resistance via acquired MEN1 mutations (M327I/V, G331R/D, T349M) has been identified in approximately 38.7% of revumenib-treated patients who progress after two or more cycles. Differentiation syndrome remains the most characteristic class-specific toxicity, occurring in approximately 11-28% of patients across agents (rates vary by cohort, data cut and prophylaxis strategy). Conclusions: Menin inhibitors represent a clinically important addition to the treatment of KMT2A- and mNPM1-driven AML, following the precedent set by FLT3 and IDH inhibitors. Combination approaches with hypomethylating agents and BCL-2 inhibition show particular promise, although no randomized controlled trial has yet demonstrated a survival benefit and current evidence derives predominantly from single-arm, early-phase studies. Ongoing randomized trials will define the definitive role of these agents across disease settings.
Related Concept Videos
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
Inhibitors of Viral Protein Synthesis
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
