Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2026

A Three-Dimensional Digital Model for Early Diagnosis of Hepatic Fibrosis Based on Magnetic Resonance Elastography
Published on: July 21, 2023
Adaptive Liver Stiffness Quantification in Magnetic Resonance Elastography Using a Heterogeneity-Aware Deep Learning
Manar El Oued1, Narjes Benameur2, Sonia Esseghaeir3
1Research Laboratory of Biophysics and Medical Technologies, University of Tunis El Manar, Higher Institute of Medical Technologies of Tunis, 1006, Tunis, Tunisia. manar.eloued@etudiant-istmt.utm.tn.
Abstract:
Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) enables non-invasive liver stiffness measurement (LSM). However, accurate quantification remains operator-dependent particularly for identifying clinically valid measurement regions and selecting a representative sampling strategy. This study developed and validated a fully automated, heterogeneity-aware deep learning framework that integrates valid-region identification, elastogram heterogeneity assessment, and a study-specific adaptive quantification strategy, while substantially reducing analysis time. The framework was evaluated in a prospective cohort of 201 subjects. Magnitude images and wave-attenuation images were combined to identify valid regions for LSM. Because spatial stiffness heterogeneity may increase sensitivity to region-of-interest (ROI) placement, elastograms were classified as homogeneous or heterogeneous using a multimodal convolutional neural network-deep neural network (CNN-DNN) classifier that integrates spatial image features with quantitative stiffness descriptors. For homogeneous elastograms, a study-specific distributed circular-ROI reduced-sampling strategy was evaluated, whereas volumetric sampling was applied to heterogeneous elastograms to better capture spatial variations in stiffness. The segmentation module achieved a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.894 ± 0.035, an Intersection over Union (IoU) of 0.810 ± 0.057, and a 95th-percentile Hausdorff-Distance (HD95) of 5.45 ± 4.05 mm. Automated LSMs showed excellent agreement with expert measurements (ICC = 0.998; Bland-Altman bias = 0.007 kPa), while reducing analysis time from approximately 15 min to 0.35 s/patient. The heterogeneity classifier achieved accuracies of 89.4% and 88.5% at the slice and patient-levels, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.928 and 0.935, respectively, demonstrating substantial patient-level agreement with the expert reference classification (Cohen's κ = 0.770). By integrating automated valid-region identification with objective elastogram heterogeneity assessment, the framework may improve standardization and reproducibility of LSM.
