Related Experiment Videos
Hepatic metabolic reprogramming after metabolic and bariatric surgery: Gene-nutrition interactions and precision
Claudia Reytor-González1, Náthaly Mercedes Román-Galeano2, Dolores Jima Gavilanes3
1Center for Evidence Ecosystems, Implementation Science, and Decision-Making (CIDES), Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud y Bienestar Humano, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Ambato, 180150, Ecuador.
Background:
Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is highly prevalent among individuals with obesity evaluated for metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) and may persist or recur despite substantial postoperative weight loss. This review examines the postoperative state as a dynamic model of hepatic metabolic reprogramming and gene-nutrition interaction, integrating surgical anatomy, dietary intake, nutrient absorption, metabolic response, weight trajectory, and inherited susceptibility.
Methods:
This was a narrative clinical review informed by a structured literature search of MEDLINE (via PubMed), the Cochrane Library, and Epistemonikos (final search, August 3, 2026). Human evidence on hepatic outcomes after MBS, genetic determinants of liver disease, and postoperative nutritional exposures was prioritized; mechanistic and non-surgical human studies were considered only where direct postoperative evidence was limited.
Results:
MBS rapidly reduces hepatic fat and improves insulin sensitivity, whereas resolution of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) and regression of fibrosis follow slower and partly dissociated trajectories. Genetic variants affecting hepatic lipid storage, lipid export, glucose-driven lipogenesis, and fibrogenesis may contribute to residual hepatic risk, but no study has jointly assessed genotype, repeated postoperative dietary exposure, and direct liver outcomes. Current evidence supports adequate protein intake, procedure-specific micronutrient supplementation, sustained dietary quality, metabolic risk control, alcohol assessment, and phenotype-guided liver surveillance regardless of genotype. Pharmacotherapy with demonstrated histological efficacy in MASH may be considered for residual MASH or weight recurrence, although it has not been evaluated specifically after MBS.
Conclusions:
Genetic information may refine the interpretation of residual hepatic risk, but genotype-guided procedure selection, dietary patterns, macronutrient targets, or supplement doses are not supported. Prospective, adequately powered, multi-ancestry studies integrating longitudinal nutrition, genetic susceptibility, and direct hepatic outcomes are needed to determine whether genotype-informed nutrition improves outcomes beyond high-quality phenotype-guided care.
Related Concept Videos
Regulation of Metabolism
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Metabolism: Overview
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Liver Regeneration
Cells of Liver
The liver comprises four major types of cells— hepatocytes, stellate, Kupffer, and sinusoidal endothelial cells. The hepatocytes are large...