Related Experiment Videos
Development and validation of predictive models for the hemodialysis adequacy index (Kt/V) using multiple linear
Le-le Li1, Rui-Feng Xu1, Liang-Liang Huang2
1Department of Nephrology, The Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, China.
Background And Objective:
Kt/V is a widely used indicator for assessing hemodialysis (HD) adequacy, but conventional measurement methods require blood sampling and are impractical for large-scale or real-time use. This study aimed to develop and validate predictive models for Kt/V using multiple linear regression (MLR) and machine learning algorithms, enabling clinicians to estimate dialysis adequacy before a session begins using simple, non-invasive parameters.
Methods:
A total of 1,017 eligible patients were enrolled from seven HD centers in Hohhot City, China, and divided into training (n = 677), internal (n = 220), and external validation (n = 120) sets. From 26 candidate variables, eight clinically meaningful derived features were constructed, and a multi-algorithm fusion strategy integrating F test, Mutual Information, Random Forest importance, XGBoost importance, LASSO coefficients, Permutation Importance, Recursive Feature Elimination, and Boruta was employed for feature selection. Five final features (body surface area, pre-dialysis weight, standardized blood flow, sex, and circulating blood volume) were selected. Eight point-prediction models (MLR, XGBoost, LightGBM, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, KNN, SVM, and BPNN), a simple average ensemble of the three top-performing models, and two probabilistic prediction methods (LightGBM Quantile Regression and NGBoost) were developed. Hyperparameter tuning was performed using GridSearchCV with 5-fold cross-validation. Model performance was evaluated using R2, RMSE, and MAE on internal and external validation sets.
Results:
On external validation, the SVM model achieved the highest R2 (0.5931) and lowest RMSE (0.1633) and MAE (0.1214) among individual models, followed by Gradient Boosting (R2 = 0.5748, RMSE = 0.1670, MAE = 0.1276) and XGBoost (R2 = 0.5681, RMSE = 0.1683, MAE = 0.1288). The ensemble model achieved the best overall performance (R2 = 0.5911, RMSE = 0.1637, MAE = 0.1240). Calibration assessment revealed all models were well-calibrated without requiring post-hoc adjustment. For probabilistic prediction, NGBoost provided well-calibrated 80% prediction intervals (PICP = 82.27%) with narrower intervals than LightGBM Quantile Regression. SHAP analysis identified BSA, standardized blood flow, and gender as the most influential predictors.
Conclusion:
Machine learning models, particularly SVM, the ensemble model, and NGBoost, can provide accurate, interpretable, and uncertainty-aware predictions of Kt/V using non-invasive, readily available parameters. The development of a local standalone executable application further facilitates clinical translation, enabling pre-dialysis prediction and real-time prescription adjustment. Prospective validation in diverse populations is warranted to confirm generalizability.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate Based on Serum Creatinine Concentration
Hemodialysis III: Nursing Management
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care