Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2026

Evaluation of a Smartphone-based Human Activity Recognition System in a Daily Living Environment
Published on: December 11, 2015
Informed Non-Use: The Hazards of Mobilising Law in Precarious Housing Arrangements
Anna Wyss1, Katharina Winkler1, Tobias Eule1
1University of Bern, Switzerland.
Abstract:
This article explores why individuals in vulnerable positions may not mobilise available legal avenues to protect themselves from harm, despite being aware of their existence. Drawing on data relating to precarious housing situations in Berlin and Zurich, we argue that the assumption that mobilising the law would improve the situation of individuals is not always accurate. We present three dimensions of non-mobilisation that prevent individuals from turning to the law: (1) their precarious market position in relation to their landlords, (2) the perceived detrimental impact of legal mobilisation on other legal affairs and (3) available solutions do not fit individuals' complex realities. Theoretically, we bring insights from the 'non-take-up' literature in social policy into the debate around legal mobilisation and legal consciousness. We argue for a more nuanced understanding of legal mobilisation that takes into account both people's understanding of law and their broader legal, economic and lived realities.
Related Concept Videos
Movement Joints in Buildings
The simplest type of movement joints, working joints, are...
Sources of Law
Constitutional law is foundational, deriving from federal and state constitutions, and...
Household Wiring And Electrical Safety
Bystander Effect
Schemas
Social Traps
