Steric and Guest-Controlled Strain Redistribution Modulates Spin Crossover and Optical Readout in BODIPY-Functionalized Hofmann-Type Frameworks
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2026

Single-Molecule Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Methods for Real-Time Investigation of the Holliday Junction Resolution by GEN1
Published on: September 18, 2019
Xin-Li Shi1, Jie-Sheng Hu1, Hong-Tai Chen1
1Key Laboratory of Cluster Science of Ministry of Education, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Liangxiang Campus, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing102488, P. R. China.
Abstract:
Modulating spin crossover (SCO) in Fe(II) frameworks requires control over both the ligand field and the way spin-state strain is redistributed through the lattice. Herein, we report a BODIPY-functionalized Hofmann-type framework platform in which steric design and guest-imposed mechanical constraints tune SCO through lattice compliance. 1 and 2, constructed from methyl- and phenyl-substituted pyridyl-BODIPY ligands, retain closely related [Ag(CN)2]--based connectivity. The moderate increase in ligand steric demand from 1 to 2 perturbs linker geometry, interlayer coupling, and packing environment, producing two-step SCO in 1 and a frustrated four-step transition in 2. In contrast, the anthracenyl-substituted ligand in 3 induces formation of a distinct framework containing [Ag2(CN)3]- linkers. Its higher-temperature one-step SCO therefore reflects the combined effects of ligand identity, altered cyanometallate connectivity, and framework packing rather than anthracenyl steric alone. Guest inclusion within porous 1 provides an alternative strategy: differences in guest rigidity, loading, and host-guest contact density reshape the host deformation pathway and tune the SCO profile without changing the Fe-Ag framework connectivity. The incorporation of the BODIPY chromophore induces diverse, nonmonotonic emission evolution across 1, 2, desolvated 3, and guest-loaded derivatives of 1, suggesting the unique ability of the BODIPY chromophore to probe both spin transitions and local microenvironments. These results identify steric bulk, framework connectivity, and guest-imposed constraints as coupled chemical variables for controlling strain accommodation and SCO in Hofmann-type frameworks featuring optical readouts.
Related Concept Videos
[3,3] Sigmatropic Rearrangement of 1,5-Dienes: Cope Rearrangement
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Thermal Sigmatropic Reactions: Overview
Sigmatropic shifts are classified based on an order term [i, j ], where i and j indicate the number of atoms across which each end of the σ bond migrates. Below are examples of a [3,3] sigmatropic shift in 1,5-hexadiene, referred to as...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...
