Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2026

A Fish-feeding Laboratory Bioassay to Assess the Antipredatory Activity of Secondary Metabolites from the Tissues of Marine Organisms
Published on: January 11, 2015
Molecular Screening for Potential Resistance to Toxic Invasive Prey: Implications for Island Conservation
Alisa Tobe1, Masako Izawa2, Miho Inoue-Murayama1
1Wildlife Research Center, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8203, Japan.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Invasive species can disrupt native predator-prey interactions, and toxic invasive prey may pose particular threats to native predators. The cane toad (Rhinella marina) secretes cardiotonic steroids (CTSs) that can cause lethal poisoning in predators. We reviewed the molecular basis and evolutionary patterns of CTS resistance and evaluated the potential and limitations of genetic screening for assessing wildlife vulnerability on Ishigaki-jima and Iriomote-jima Islands, Japan. Methods: We reviewed experimental, structural, and evolutionary evidence for CTS resistance associated with Na+/K+-ATPase α subunit (NKAα) and screened publicly available NKAα1 sequences from vertebrates occurring on the two islands, focusing on amino acid states previously associated with CTS target-site insensitivity. Results: NKAα1 sequences were available for 96 of 185 native terrestrial vertebrate species. Most retained the putatively ancestral Q111/N122 combination, whereas alternative states at these major resistance-associated sites occurred in only a few species. These included T111/N122 in the black-faced spoonbill (Platalea minor), and E111/N122 in the crested serpent-eagle (Spilornis cheela perplexus) and grey-faced buzzard (Butastur indicus). T111 has shown context-dependent effects on CTS sensitivity in functional assays, whereas E111 has been proposed as a candidate resistance-associated state but lacks direct functional validation. The endangered Iriomote cat (Prionailurus bengalensis iriomotensis), an endemic predator that frequently consumes anurans, retained Q111/N122. Conclusions: NKAα1 sequence alone cannot establish whole-animal susceptibility or conservation risk because resistance may depend on sequence background, other NKAα paralogs, physiological mechanisms, and behavior. Molecular screening should therefore be viewed as an initial tool for identifying candidate molecular signatures and prioritizing species and knowledge gaps for subsequent functional, toxicological, and ecological investigation.
More Related Videos
09:58Environmental Screening of Aeromonas hydrophila, Mycobacterium spp., and Pseudocapillaria tomentosa in Zebrafish Systems
Published on: December 8, 2017
10:17Laboratory Protocol for Genetic Gut Content Analyses of Aquatic Macroinvertebrates Using Group-specific rDNA Primers
Published on: October 5, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Declining Populations
Conservation of Small Populations