Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2026

Identification of Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation in RNA-seq Data
Published on: June 24, 2021
SpliceCOV: Supervised Filtering of RNA-Seq-Derived Transcript Features Improves Transcriptome Assembly
Celine Hoh1,2, Ida Shinder2,3, Kuan-Hao Chao1,2
1Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: High-throughput RNA sequencing enables transcript discovery and quantification, but the resulting coverage profiles often contain substantial transcriptional noise, making it difficult to distinguish genuine transcript features from spurious signals. These noisy signals can propagate into transcriptome assemblies, increasing the number of false transcript models and reducing annotation precision. Methods: We present SpliceCOV, a supervised framework for filtering RNA-Seq-derived transcript features. Rather than performing general-purpose segmentation of RNA-Seq coverage, SpliceCOV uses coverage- and junction-derived features to distinguish likely genuine splice sites and transcript boundaries from noisy candidates. We benchmarked SpliceCOV against established changepoint methods and evaluated whether SpliceCOV-filtered features improve downstream transcriptome assembly with StringTie. Results: Across human GTEx tissue datasets, SpliceCOV substantially reduced likely false-positive splice sites while retaining most annotated sites. We included segmentation-based methods as baselines to assess whether generic coverage changepoints can support RNA-Seq transcript-feature filtering. Because these methods are unsupervised whereas SpliceCOV is trained using annotation-derived labels, the comparisons are intended to assess suitability for this specific filtering task rather than to provide a general ranking of the underlying algorithms. Under this evaluation framework, SpliceCOV retained more annotation-supported splice sites at comparable levels of filtering. For transcript start and end sites, SpliceCOV reduced the majority of false positives while retaining substantial overlap with reference annotations. When SpliceCOV-filtered splice sites and transcript boundaries were supplied to StringTie, transcript-level precision increased across the evaluated tissues while the number of reference-matching transcripts remained broadly similar. The model also showed transferability across tissues and chromosomes, and could be applied to mouse RNA-Seq without retraining, although downstream assembly performance was lower than in human datasets. Conclusions: SpliceCOV provides a supervised approach for filtering noisy RNA-Seq-derived transcript features before transcriptome assembly. By improving the quality of splice-site and transcript-boundary evidence supplied to downstream assembly, SpliceCOV can increase transcript-level precision while preserving transcript recovery.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
RNA Splicing
RNA Splicing
Pre-mRNA Processing: RNA Splicing
Alternative RNA Splicing
There are five types of alternative RNA splicing that vary in the ways the pre-mRNA segments are removed or retained in the mature mRNA. The first...
Alternative RNA Splicing
There are five types of alternative RNA splicing that vary in the ways the pre-mRNA segments are removed or retained in the mature mRNA. The first...
RNA-seq
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while microarray-based...

