Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
No Evidence of Infrahumanization or Trait-Based Dehumanization in Children's Evaluation of Gender Nonconforming Peers
Marshall M C Hui1, Karson T F Kung1
1Department of Psychology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Abstract:
A recent study (Hui & Kung, 2025), using a visual scale and a mind perception task, has found that children aged 9-12 years blatantly and subtly dehumanize gender nonconforming (GN) peers. While this recent study has provided some novel insights into children's evaluation of GN peers, it remains unknown whether the observed effects can be generalized to other forms of dehumanization. In the broader dehumanization literature, some studies have reported that different dehumanization processes co-occur, but other studies have reported inconsistent findings across measures and forms of dehumanization. Extending Hui and Kung (2025), the present study examined two additional forms of dehumanization (infrahumanization and trait-based dehumanization) in 235 children aged 9-12 years. Using emotion and trait attribution tasks, children rated hypothetical gender conforming (GC) peers and GN peers on primary (or non-uniquely human) and secondary (or uniquely human) emotions as well as uniquely human (UH) and human nature (HN) traits. Children's ratings were analyzed using mixed-design ANOVAs, with participant gender (boy, girl) and age group (9-10 y, 11-12 y) as between-subjects factors, and peer gender (boy, girl), peer gender conformity (GC, GN), and emotion/trait type (primary, secondary; UH, HN) as within-subjects factors. Results indicated that children did not differentially attribute secondary emotions or UH/HN traits to GC and GN peers. Contributing new developmental evidence based on a peer gender nonconformity paradigm, the present study augments the growing research literature suggesting that different forms of dehumanization are distinct processes that may not necessarily co-occur. The present study also concurs with recent critiques highlighting that some previously reported effects of infrahumanization and trait-based dehumanization may have been products of methodological artifacts confounding humanness with prosociality and valence in the trait stimuli employed.
Related Concept Videos
Socioemotional Experience and Gender Development
Parental Influences on Gender Typing
Relationships with Peers During Infancy and Toddlerhood
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
Deindividuation
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth. This guiding role...
